mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimal policy evaluation using kernel-based temporal difference methods

arXiv 2109.12002 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2021stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study methods based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces for estimating the value function of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov reward process (MRP). We study a regularized form of the kernel least-squares temporal difference (LSTD) estimate; in the population limit of infinite data, it corresponds to the fixed point of a projected Bellman operator defined by the associated reproducing kernel Hilbert space. The estimator itself is obtained by computing the projected fixed point induced by a regularized version of the empirical operator; due to the underlying kernel structure, this reduces to solving a linear system involving kernel matrices. We analyze the error of this estimate in the L2(μ)-norm, where μ denotes the stationary distribution of the underlying Markov chain. Our analysis imposes no assumptions on the transition operator of the Markov chain, but rather only conditions on the reward function and population-level kernel LSTD solutions. We use empirical process theory techniques to derive a non-asymptotic upper bound on the error with explicit dependence on the eigenvalues of the associated kernel operator, as well as the instance-dependent variance of the Bellman residual error. In addition, we prove minimax lower bounds over sub-classes of MRPs, which shows that our rate is optimal in terms of the sample size n and the effective horizon H = (1 - γ)-1. Whereas existing worst-case theory predicts cubic scaling (H3) in the effective horizon, our theory reveals that there is in fact a much wider range of scalings, depending on the kernel, the stationary distribution, and the variance of the Bellman residual error. Notably, it is only parametric and near-parametric problems that can ever achieve the worst-case cubic scaling.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2021.

Builds on

14 of 59 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  2. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
  3. 2019Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Samplingcited by 118
  4. 2019Double Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation in Markov Decision Processescited by 118
  5. 2020On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentrationcited by 65
  6. 2020Asymptotically Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation for Tabular Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  7. 2020Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysiscited by 41
  8. 2019A Kernel Loss for Solving the Bellman Equationcited by 37
  9. 2020Accountable Off-Policy Evaluation With Kernel Bellman Statisticscited by 36
  10. 2015Randomized sketches for kernels: Fast and optimal non-parametric regressioncited by 31
  11. 2017Early stopping for kernel boosting algorithms: A general analysis with localized complexitiescited by 27
  12. 2014Practical Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
2 more
  1. 2021An L2 Analysis of Reinforcement Learning in High Dimensions with Kernel and Neural Network Approximationcited by 13
  2. 2020Optimal oracle inequalities for solving projected fixed-point equationscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 10; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022On Well-posedness and Minimax Optimal Rates of Nonparametric Q-function Estimation in Off-policy Evaluationcited by 33
  2. 2022On Instance-Dependent Bounds for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 22
  3. 2021Accelerated and instance-optimal policy evaluation with linear function approximationcited by 18
  4. 2022Off-Policy Fitted Q-Evaluation with Differentiable Function Approximators: Z-Estimation and Inference Theorycited by 18
  5. 2023Pseudo-Labeling for Kernel Ridge Regression under Covariate Shiftcited by 17
  6. 2023High-probability sample complexities for policy evaluation with linear function approximationcited by 16
  7. 2022Sample Complexity of Nonparametric Off-Policy Evaluation on Low-Dimensional Manifolds using Deep Networkscited by 12
  8. 2024Hybrid Transfer Reinforcement Learning: Provable Sample Efficiency from Shifted-Dynamics Datacited by 8
  9. 2022A Complete Characterization of Linear Estimators for Offline Policy Evaluationcited by 7
  10. 2023Improved Bayesian Regret Bounds for Thompson Sampling in Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  11. 2023Kernel-based off-policy estimation without overlap: Instance optimality beyond semiparametric efficiencycited by 6
  12. 2022Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
12 more
  1. 2021Perturbational Complexity by Distribution Mismatch: A Systematic Analysis of Reinforcement Learning in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacecited by 4
  2. 2022Policy evaluation from a single path: Multi-step methods, mixing and mis-specificationcited by 3
  3. 2023VIPeR: Provably Efficient Algorithm for Offline RL with Neural Function Approximationcited by 3
  4. 2023The Optimal Approximation Factors in Misspecified Off-Policy Value Function Estimationcited by 3
  5. 2024Taming "data-hungry" reinforcement learning? Stability in continuous state-action spacescited by 3
  6. 2022Krylov-Bellman boosting: Super-linear policy evaluation in general state spacescited by 2
  7. 2022Optimal Estimation of Off-Policy Policy Gradient via Double Fitted Iterationcited by 1
  8. 2022Inference on Time Series Nonparametric Conditional Moment Restrictions Using General Sievescited by 1
  9. 2025Sampling Complexity of TD and PPO in RKHScited by 1
  10. 2026A Unifying View of Coverage in Linear Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 1
  11. 2024Is Offline Decision Making Possible with Only Few Samples? Reliable Decisions in Data-Starved Bandits via Trust Region Enhancementcited by 0
  12. 2025Generalized Fitted Q-Iteration with Clustered Datacited by 0