mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pixel-Level Face Image Quality Assessment for Explainable Face Recognition

arXiv 2110.11001 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An essential factor to achieve high performance in face recognition systems is the quality of its samples. Since these systems are involved in daily life there is a strong need of making face recognition processes understandable for humans. In this work, we introduce the concept of pixel-level face image quality that determines the utility of pixels in a face image for recognition. We propose a training-free approach to assess the pixel-level qualities of a face image given an arbitrary face recognition network. To achieve this, a model-specific quality value of the input image is estimated and used to build a sample-specific quality regression model. Based on this model, quality-based gradients are back-propagated and converted into pixel-level quality estimates. In the experiments, we qualitatively and quantitatively investigated the meaningfulness of our proposed pixel-level qualities based on real and artificial disturbances and by comparing the explanation maps on faces incompliant with the ICAO standards. In all scenarios, the results demonstrate that the proposed solution produces meaningful pixel-level qualities enhancing the interpretability of the complete face image quality. The code is publicly available

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  5. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  6. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
  7. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 624
  8. 2018Image Inpainting for Irregular Holes Using Partial Convolutionscited by 505
  9. 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 341
  10. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 334
  11. 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 276
  12. 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 175
12 more
  1. 2020SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustnesscited by 112
  2. 2020Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Surveycited by 80
  3. 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 64
  4. 2019FaceQnet: Quality Assessment for Face Recognition based on Deep Learningcited by 62
  5. 2020Explainable Face Recognitioncited by 34
  6. 2018Unravelling Robustness of Deep Learning based Face Recognition Against Adversarial Attackscited by 31
  7. 2020Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 31
  8. 2018Towards Interpretable Face Recognitioncited by 30
  9. 2018Stacked Dense U-Nets with Dual Transformers for Robust Face Alignmentcited by 17
  10. 2013Patch-based Probabilistic Image Quality Assessment for Face Selection and Improved Video-based Face Recognitioncited by 13
  11. 2017CNN Fixations: An unraveling approach to visualize the discriminative image regionscited by 9
  12. 2019Does Generative Face Completion Help Face Recognition?cited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort: