Improving the Accuracy of Beauty Product Recommendations by Assessing Face Illumination Quality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We focus on addressing the challenges in responsible beauty product recommendation, particularly when it involves comparing the product's color with a person's skin tone, such as for foundation and concealer products. To make accurate recommendations, it is crucial to infer both the product attributes and the product specific facial features such as skin conditions or tone. However, while many product photos are taken under good light conditions, face photos are taken from a wide range of conditions. The features extracted using the photos from ill-illuminated environment can be highly misleading or even be incompatible to be compared with the product attributes. Hence bad illumination condition can severely degrade quality of the recommendation. We introduce a machine learning framework for illumination assessment which classifies images into having either good or bad illumination condition. We then build an automatic user guidance tool which informs a user holding their camera if their illumination condition is good or bad. This way, the user is provided with rapid feedback and can interactively control how the photo is taken for their recommendation. Only a few studies are dedicated to this problem, mostly due to the lack of dataset that is large, labeled, and diverse both in terms of skin tones and light patterns. Lack of such dataset leads to neglecting skin tone diversity. Therefore, We begin by constructing a diverse synthetic dataset that simulates various skin tones and light patterns in addition to an existing facial image dataset. Next, we train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for illumination assessment that outperforms the existing solutions using the synthetic dataset. Finally, we analyze how the our work improves the shade recommendation for various foundation products.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2016Stacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimationcited by 913
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
- 2019MediaPipe: A Framework for Building Perception Pipelinescited by 572
- 2020BiSeNet V2: Bilateral Network with Guided Aggregation for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 294
- 2019BlazeFace: Sub-millisecond Neural Face Detection on Mobile GPUscited by 74
- 2020Soliciting Human-in-the-Loop User Feedback for Interactive Machine Learning Reduces User Trust and Impressions of Model Accuracycited by 19
- 2021Pixel-Level Face Image Quality Assessment for Explainable Face Recognitioncited by 14
- 2021FaceQvec: Vector Quality Assessment for Face Biometrics based on ISO Compliancecited by 8
- 2021Will We Trust What We Don't Understand? Impact of Model Interpretability and Outcome Feedback on Trust in AIcited by 5
2 more
- 2022Assessing Bias in Face Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
- 2017Smart Mirror: Intelligent Makeup Recommendation and Synthesiscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.