mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Provably Efficient Representation Selection in Low-rank Markov Decision Processes: From Online to Offline RL

arXiv 2106.11935 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2021cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 12

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

The success of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) lies in its ability to learn a representation that is well-suited for the exploration and exploitation task. To understand how the choice of representation can improve the efficiency of reinforcement learning (RL), we study representation selection for a class of low-rank Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) where the transition kernel can be represented in a bilinear form. We propose an efficient algorithm, called ReLEX, for representation learning in both online and offline RL. Specifically, we show that the online version of ReLEX, called ReLEX-UCB, always performs no worse than the state-of-the-art algorithm without representation selection, and achieves a strictly better constant regret if the representation function class has a "coverage" property over the entire state-action space. For the offline counterpart, ReLEX-LCB, we show that the algorithm can find the optimal policy if the representation class can cover the state-action space and achieves gap-dependent sample complexity. This is the first result with constant sample complexity for representation learning in offline RL.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 37 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2021.

Builds on

37 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning13 Jun
  2. 2021Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance Reduction2 Feb
  3. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?30 Dec
  4. 2020What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?22 Oct

Other references · 33

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  2. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 514
  3. 2016Contextual Decision Processes with Low Bellman Rank are PAC-Learnablecited by 290
  4. 2020Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement Learningcited by 263
  5. 2020Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted Regressioncited by 233
  6. 2020FLAMBE: Structural Complexity and Representation Learning of Low Rank MDPscited by 232
  7. 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 203
  8. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Feature Space: Matrix Bandit, Kernels, and Regret Boundcited by 199
  9. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 199
  10. 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 180
  11. 2021Bilinear Classes: A Structural Framework for Provable Generalization in RLcited by 176
  12. 2019Provably efficient RL with Rich Observations via Latent State Decodingcited by 169
21 more
  1. 2019Is a Good Representation Sufficient for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning?cited by 140
  2. 2019Kinematic State Abstraction and Provably Efficient Rich-Observation Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  3. 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 104
  4. 2020Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Feature Mappingcited by 102
  5. 2019Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning using Linearly Combined Model Ensemblescited by 100
  6. 2016Corralling a Band of Bandit Algorithmscited by 99
  7. 2021Model-free Representation Learning and Exploration in Low-rank MDPscited by 82
  8. 2020Logarithmic Regret for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 79
  9. 2020Instance-Dependent Complexity of Contextual Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: A Disagreement-Based Perspectivecited by 78
  10. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
  11. 2017Near Optimal Behavior via Approximate State Abstractioncited by 63
  12. 2019Model selection for contextual banditscited by 60
  13. 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 59
  14. 2020Learning Infinite-horizon Average-reward MDPs with Linear Function Approximationcited by 48
  15. 2020Regret Bound Balancing and Elimination for Model Selection in Bandits and RLcited by 45
  16. 2020Offline Policy Selection under Uncertaintycited by 31
  17. 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
  18. 2019OSOM: A simultaneously optimal algorithm for multi-armed and linear contextual banditscited by 28
  19. 2020Problem-Complexity Adaptive Model Selection for Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 26
  20. 2020Regret Balancing for Bandit and RL Model Selectioncited by 20
  21. 2020Open Problem: Model Selection for Contextual Banditscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Rethinking Model-based, Policy-based, and Value-based Reinforcement Learning via the Lens of Representation Complexity
  2. 2022Provable Benefit of Multitask Representation Learning in Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2021Representation Matters: Offline Pretraining for Sequential Decision Making
  4. 2025Statistical and Algorithmic Foundations of Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2022Oracle Inequalities for Model Selection in Offline Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2024On Sample-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: Data Diversity, Posterior Sampling, and Beyond
  7. 2024Offline RL via Feature-Occupancy Gradient Ascent
  8. 2022Behavior Prior Representation learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning