mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Rethinking Noisy Label Models: Labeler-Dependent Noise with Adversarial Awareness

arXiv 2105.14083 ↗First posted 28 May 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most studies on learning from noisy labels rely on unrealistic models of i.i.d. label noise, such as class-conditional transition matrices. More recent work on instance-dependent noise models are more realistic, but assume a single generative process for label noise across the entire dataset. We propose a more principled model of label noise that generalizes instance-dependent noise to multiple labelers, based on the observation that modern datasets are typically annotated using distributed crowdsourcing methods. Under our labeler-dependent model, label noise manifests itself under two modalities: natural error of good-faith labelers, and adversarial labels provided by malicious actors. We present two adversarial attack vectors that more accurately reflect the label noise that may be encountered in real-world settings, and demonstrate that under our multimodal noisy labels model, state-of-the-art approaches for learning from noisy labels are defeated by adversarial label attacks. Finally, we propose a multi-stage, labeler-aware, model-agnostic framework that reliably filters noisy labels by leveraging knowledge about which data partitions were labeled by which labeler, and show that our proposed framework remains robust even in the presence of extreme adversarial label noise.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 128 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2021.

Builds on

52 of 128 references.

References · 52

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  6. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  7. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  8. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  9. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  10. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  11. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  12. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
38 more
  1. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  2. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  3. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  4. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  5. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  6. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  7. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  8. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  9. 2016Ladder Variational Autoencoderscited by 318
  10. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  11. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  12. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  13. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  14. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  15. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  16. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  17. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  18. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  19. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
  20. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  21. 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
  22. 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
  23. 2020A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 90
  24. 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
  25. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  26. 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
  27. 2016Auxiliary Deep Generative Modelscited by 72
  28. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
  29. 2014Spectral Methods meet EM: A Provably Optimal Algorithm for Crowdsourcingcited by 63
  30. 2019Do We Train on Test Data? Purging CIFAR of Near-Duplicatescited by 62
  31. 2019Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergencescited by 61
  32. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  33. 2014Training Convolutional Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 48
  34. 2020When Optimizing f-divergence is Robust with Label Noisecited by 44
  35. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  36. 2020Adversarial Crowdsourcing Through Robust Rank-One Matrix Completioncited by 21
  37. 2017Two-temperature logistic regression based on the Tsallis divergencecited by 14
  38. 2021Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise via a Universal Probabilistic Modelcited by 12

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.