Dealing with Non-Stationarity in MARL via Trust-Region Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Non-stationarity is one thorny issue in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). One of the reasons is the policy changes of agents during the learning process. Some existing works have discussed various consequences caused by non-stationarity with several kinds of measurement indicators. This makes the objectives or goals of existing algorithms are inevitably inconsistent and disparate. In this paper, we introduce a novel notion, the δ-measurement, to explicitly measure the non-stationarity of a policy sequence, which can be further proved to be bounded by the KL-divergence of consecutive joint policies. A straightforward but highly non-trivial way is to control the joint policies' divergence, which is difficult to estimate accurately by imposing the trust-region constraint on the joint policy. Although it has lower computational complexity to decompose the joint policy and impose trust-region constraints on the factorized policies, simple policy factorization like mean-field approximation will lead to more considerable policy divergence, which can be considered as the trust-region decomposition dilemma. We model the joint policy as a pairwise Markov random field and propose a trust-region decomposition network (TRD-Net) based on message passing to estimate the joint policy divergence more accurately. The Multi-Agent Mirror descent policy algorithm with Trust region decomposition, called MAMT, is established by adjusting the trust-region of the local policies adaptively in an end-to-end manner. MAMT can approximately constrain the consecutive joint policies' divergence to satisfy δ-stationarity and alleviate the non-stationarity problem. Our method can bring noticeable and stable performance improvement compared with baselines in cooperative tasks of different complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2021.
Builds on
49 of 77 references.
References · 49
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 636
- 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 590
- 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 313
37 more
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
- 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 286
- 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 264
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 261
- 2018Machine Theory of Mindcited by 226
- 2017Learning with Opponent-Learning Awarenesscited by 222
- 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 220
- 2017Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximationcited by 121
- 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 118
- 2017Stabilising Experience Replay for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 117
- 2017Continuous Adaptation via Meta-Learning in Nonstationary and Competitive Environmentscited by 108
- 2020Mirror Descent Policy Optimizationcited by 106
- 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 98
- 2017A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments: Dealing with Non-Stationaritycited by 94
- 2019Dealing with Non-Stationarity in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
- 2020Learning Latent Representations to Influence Multi-Agent Interactioncited by 93
- 2019Provably Efficient Q-Learning with Low Switching Costcited by 78
- 2020Towards Playing Full MOBA Games with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
- 2018Modeling Others using Oneself in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
- 2020A Survey of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Dynamically Varying Environmentscited by 62
- 2013Online Learning with Switching Costs and Other Adaptive Adversariescited by 61
- 2020Deep Implicit Coordination Graphs for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2019Emergent Coordination Through Competitioncited by 57
- 2018Stable Opponent Shaping in Differentiable Gamescited by 49
- 2020A Policy Gradient Algorithm for Learning to Learn in Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
- 2020Learning Fair Policies in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2021A Provably Efficient Algorithm for Linear Markov Decision Process with Low Switching Costcited by 40
- 2019Variational Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
- 2020A Kernel-Based Approach to Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning in Metric Spacescited by 32
- 2017Trust-PCL: An Off-Policy Trust Region Method for Continuous Controlcited by 30
- 2018A Sliding-Window Algorithm for Markov Decision Processes with Arbitrarily Changing Rewards and Transitionscited by 30
- 2020Multi-Agent Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 20
- 2019Neighborhood Cognition Consistent Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2019Learning to Collaborate in Markov Decision Processescited by 14
- 2020A Maximum Mutual Information Framework for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2019Arena: A General Evaluation Platform and Building Toolkit for Multi-Agent Intelligencecited by 9
- 2020Linear Last-iterate Convergence in Constrained Saddle-point Optimizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Order Matters: Agent-by-agent Policy Optimizationcited by 24
- 2025Overcoming Environmental Meta-Stationarity in MARL via Adaptive Curriculum and Counterfactual Group Advantagecited by 1
- 2022Distributed Influence-Augmented Local Simulators for Parallel MARL in Large Networked Systemscited by 0
- 2026A Unified Causal-Origin Taxonomy of Distributional Shifts in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Low Variance Trust Region Optimization with Independent Actors and Sequential Updates in Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Low Variance Trust Region Optimization with Independent Actors and Sequential Updates in Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning24 Jun 2026
- 2026A Unified Causal-Origin Taxonomy of Distributional Shifts in Reinforcement Learning15 Jun 2026
- 2025Overcoming Environmental Meta-Stationarity in MARL via Adaptive Curriculum and Counterfactual Group Advantage9 Jun 2025
- 2023Order Matters: Agent-by-agent Policy Optimization13 Feb 2023
- 2022Distributed Influence-Augmented Local Simulators for Parallel MARL in Large Networked Systems1 Jul 2022