mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Low Variance Trust Region Optimization with Independent Actors and Sequential Updates in Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2606.25526 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning assumes each agent shares the same reward function and can be trained effectively using the Trust Region framework of single-agent. Instead of relying on other agents' actions, the independent actors setting considers each agent to act based only on its local information, thus having more flexible applications. However, in the sequential update framework, it is required to re-estimate the joint advantage function after each individual agent's policy step. Despite the practical success of importance sampling, the updated advantage function suffers from exponentially high variance problems, which likely result in unstable convergence. In this work, we first analyze the high variance advantage both empirically and theoretically. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a clipping objective to control the upper bounds of the advantage fluctuation in sequential updates. With the proposed objective, we provide a monotonic bound with sub-linear convergence to ε-Nash Equilibria. We further derive two new practical algorithms using our clipping objective. The experiment results on three popular multi-agent reinforcement learning benchmarks show that our proposed method outperforms the tested baselines in most environments. By carefully analyzing different training settings, our proposed method is highlighted with both stable convergence properties and the desired low advantage variance estimation. For reproducibility purposes, our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/giangbang/Low-Variance-Trust-Region-MARL.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

34 of 42 references.

References · 34

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  3. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  4. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  5. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
  6. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
  7. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 597
  8. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
  9. 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
  10. 2016Safe and Efficient Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 264
  11. 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 212
  12. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 186
22 more
  1. 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 182
  2. 2020FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradientscited by 178
  3. 2017Equivalence Between Policy Gradients and Soft Q-Learningcited by 173
  4. 2021Policy Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning: Linear Convergence, New Sampling Complexity, and Generalized Problem Classescited by 156
  5. 2022Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning is a Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 155
  6. 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 118
  7. 2021Independent Policy Gradient Methods for Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 101
  8. 2017A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments: Dealing with Non-Stationaritycited by 94
  9. 2021Global Convergence of Multi-Agent Policy Gradient in Markov Potential Gamescited by 93
  10. 2023Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 69
  11. 2022Independent Policy Gradient for Large-Scale Markov Potential Games: Sharper Rates, Function Approximation, and Game-Agnostic Convergencecited by 57
  12. 2018The Mirage of Action-Dependent Baselines in Reinforcement Learningcited by 48
  13. 2021Settling the Variance of Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 45
  14. 2021Multi-Agent Constrained Policy Optimisationcited by 35
  15. 2020Beyond variance reduction: Understanding the true impact of baselines on policy optimizationcited by 32
  16. 2023Order Matters: Agent-by-agent Policy Optimizationcited by 24
  17. 2020Multi-Agent Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 20
  18. 2021Coordinated Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 16
  19. 2022Pareto Actor-Critic for Equilibrium Selection in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  20. 2021Dealing with Non-Stationarity in MARL via Trust-Region Decompositioncited by 5
  21. 2021Neural PPO-Clip Attains Global Optimality: A Hinge Loss Perspectivecited by 4
  22. 2023Local Optimization Achieves Global Optimality in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Rethinking Ratio-Based Trust Regions for Policy Optimization in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Multi-Agent Trust Region Policy Optimisation: A Joint Constraint Approach
  3. 2026α-fair heterogeneous agent reinforcement learning
  4. 2026Aggregate in the Advantage, Not the Ratio: A Canonical-Form Analysis of Cooperative Multi-Agent Policy Optimization
  5. 2024Fully Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
  6. 2026Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Agent-Specific Preference
  7. 2025Cooperative Game-Theoretic Credit Assignment for Multi-Agent Policy Gradients via the Core
  8. 2025Improving monotonic optimization in heterogeneous multi-agent reinforcement learning with optimal marginal deterministic policy gradient