mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards the Right Kind of Fairness in AI

arXiv 2102.08453 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2021cs.AI cs.HCcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness is a concept of justice. Various definitions exist, some of them conflicting with each other. In the absence of an uniformly accepted notion of fairness, choosing the right kind for a specific situation has always been a central issue in human history. When it comes to implementing sustainable fairness in artificial intelligence systems, this old question plays a key role once again: How to identify the most appropriate fairness metric for a particular application? The answer is often a matter of context, and the best choice depends on ethical standards and legal requirements. Since ethics guidelines on this topic are kept rather general for now, we aim to provide more hands-on guidance with this document. Therefore, we first structure the complex landscape of existing fairness metrics and explain the different options by example. Furthermore, we propose the "Fairness Compass", a tool which formalises the selection process and makes identifying the most appropriate fairness definition for a given system a simple, straightforward procedure. Because this process also allows to document the reasoning behind the respective decisions, we argue that this approach can help to build trust from the user through explaining and justifying the implemented fairness.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.

Builds on

8 of 20 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  5. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  6. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  7. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  8. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 7; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: