Explaining how your AI system is fair
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To implement fair machine learning in a sustainable way, choosing the right fairness objective is key. Since fairness is a concept of justice which comes in various, sometimes conflicting definitions, this is not a trivial task though. The most appropriate fairness definition for an artificial intelligence (AI) system is a matter of ethical standards and legal requirements, and the right choice depends on the particular use case and its context. In this position paper, we propose to use a decision tree as means to explain and justify the implemented kind of fairness to the end users. Such a structure would first of all support AI practitioners in mapping ethical principles to fairness definitions for a concrete application and therefore make the selection a straightforward and transparent process. However, this approach would also help document the reasoning behind the decision making. Due to the general complexity of the topic of fairness in AI, we argue that specifying "fairness" for a given use case is the best way forward to maintain confidence in AI systems. In this case, this could be achieved by sharing the reasons and principles expressed during the decision making process with the broader audience.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2021.
Builds on
8 of 12 references.
References · 8
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
- 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
- 2021Towards the Right Kind of Fairness in AIcited by 15
- 2020Getting Fairness Right: Towards a Toolbox for Practitionerscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.