mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Variable Selection in the Context of AI Fairness

arXiv 2608.11251 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in AI systems has become more important with recent regulatory demands, such as the EU AI Act. Traditional approaches often do not take into account philosophical ethics and social awareness. Variable selection processes, in particular, can introduce implicit bias, affecting equity across different subgroups. We discuss a mathematical approach that evaluates fairness in AI, aligning mathematical methodologies with ethical considerations and regulatory requirements. Our aim is to advocate for interdisciplinary collaboration to address fairness, emphasizing the importance of understanding broader ethical and societal contexts. Our approach emphasizes maintaining all potentially relevant variables to allow for more granular fairness assessments and to reduce implicit bias. The findings suggest that the exclusion of sensitive or critical variables may compromise equity between subgroups. In contrast, retaining all relevant variables could reduce implicit bias. Thus, the interdisciplinary approach could provide deeper insight into the ethical implications and compliance with regulatory standards. By integrating a mathematical approach with ethical and social awareness, we suggest more equitable outcomes and responsible AI deployment. This work underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration in effectively addressing fairness in AI systems aligned with the objectives of the European Union's AI Act, which seeks to promote trustworthy and fair AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 34 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  2. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
  3. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 127
  4. 2023Fairness And Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategiescited by 85
  5. 2018Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 72
  6. 2018Racial categories in machine learningcited by 48
  7. 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approachescited by 25
  8. 2021A Framework for Fairness: A Systematic Review of Existing Fair AI Solutionscited by 18
  9. 2021Towards the Right Kind of Fairness in AIcited by 15
  10. 2021Achieving Fairness with a Simple Ridge Penaltycited by 13
  11. 2023Strong statistical parity through fair synthetic datacited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.