FairCompass: Operationalising Fairness in Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly becomes an integral part of our societal and individual activities, there is a growing imperative to develop responsible AI solutions. Despite a diverse assortment of machine learning fairness solutions is proposed in the literature, there is reportedly a lack of practical implementation of these tools in real-world applications. Industry experts have participated in thorough discussions on the challenges associated with operationalising fairness in the development of machine learning-empowered solutions, in which a shift toward human-centred approaches is promptly advocated to mitigate the limitations of existing techniques. In this work, we propose a human-in-the-loop approach for fairness auditing, presenting a mixed visual analytical system (hereafter referred to as 'FairCompass'), which integrates both subgroup discovery technique and the decision tree-based schema for end users. Moreover, we innovatively integrate an Exploration, Guidance and Informed Analysis loop, to facilitate the use of the Knowledge Generation Model for Visual Analytics in FairCompass. We evaluate the effectiveness of FairCompass for fairness auditing in a real-world scenario, and the findings demonstrate the system's potential for real-world deployability. We anticipate this work will address the current gaps in research for fairness and facilitate the operationalisation of fairness in machine learning systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2023.
Builds on
13 of 38 references.
References · 13
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
- 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
- 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
- 2022A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 30
- 2021A Framework for Fairness: A Systematic Review of Existing Fair AI Solutionscited by 18
1 more
- 2021Towards the Right Kind of Fairness in AIcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.
- 2024Verifiable evaluations of machine learning models using zkSNARKscited by 14
- 2024Exploring Bias and Prediction Metrics to Characterise the Fairness of Machine Learning for Equity-Centered Public Health Decision-Making: A Narrative Reviewcited by 6
- 2024Interactive Counterfactual Exploration of Algorithmic Harms in Recommender Systemscited by 1
- 2024Interactive Counterfactual Exploration of Algorithmic Harms in Recommender Systems10 Sep 2024
- 2024Exploring Bias and Prediction Metrics to Characterise the Fairness of Machine Learning for Equity-Centered Public Health Decision-Making: A Narrative Review23 Aug 2024
- 2024Verifiable evaluations of machine learning models using zkSNARKs5 Feb 2024