MIFair: A Mutual-Information Framework for Intersectionality and Multiclass Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness in machine learning remains challenging due to its ethical complexity, the absence of a universal definition, and the need for context-specific bias metrics. Existing methods still struggle with intersectionality, multiclass settings, and limited flexibility and generality. To address these gaps, we introduce MIFair, a unified framework for bias assessment and mitigation based on mutual information. MIFair provides a flexible metric template and an in-processing mitigation method inspired by the Prejudice Remover, defining group fairness as statistical independence between prediction-derived variables and sensitive attributes. We further strengthen its information-theoretic foundation by establishing equivalences with widely used fairness notions such as independence and separation. MIFair naturally supports intersectionality, complex subgroup structures, and multiclass classification and employs regularization-based training to reduce bias according to the selected metric. Its key advantage is its versatility: it consolidates diverse fairness requirements into a single coherent framework, enabling consistent benchmarking and simplifying practical use. Experiments on real-world tabular and image datasets show that MIFair effectively reduces bias, including previously unaddressed multi-attribute scenarios, while maintaining strong predictive performance across the evaluated settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
References · 20
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
8 more
- 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
- 2019Improved Adversarial Learning for Fair Classificationcited by 25
- 2020Machine learning fairness notions: Bridging the gap with real-world applicationscited by 19
- 2018Fairness in Supervised Learning: An Information Theoretic Approachcited by 17
- 2021Towards the Right Kind of Fairness in AIcited by 15
- 2020Algorithmic Decision Making with Conditional Fairnesscited by 14
- 2022Fair Generalized Linear Models with a Convex Penaltycited by 11
- 2024Enforcing Conditional Independence for Fair Representation Learning and Causal Image Generationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.