mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairpriori: Improving Biased Subgroup Discovery for Deep Neural Network Fairness

arXiv 2407.01595 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.CY cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While deep learning has become a core functional module of most software systems, concerns regarding the fairness of ML predictions have emerged as a significant issue that affects prediction results due to discrimination. Intersectional bias, which disproportionately affects members of subgroups, is a prime example of this. For instance, a machine learning model might exhibit bias against darker-skinned women, while not showing bias against individuals with darker skin or women. This problem calls for effective fairness testing before the deployment of such deep learning models in real-world scenarios. However, research into detecting such bias is currently limited compared to research on individual and group fairness. Existing tools to investigate intersectional bias lack important features such as support for multiple fairness metrics, fast and efficient computation, and user-friendly interpretation. This paper introduces Fairpriori, a novel biased subgroup discovery method, which aims to address these limitations. Fairpriori incorporates the frequent itemset generation algorithm to facilitate effective and efficient investigation of intersectional bias by producing fast fairness metric calculations on subgroups of a dataset. Through comparison with the state-of-the-art methods (e.g., Themis, FairFictPlay, and TestSGD) under similar conditions, Fairpriori demonstrates superior effectiveness and efficiency when identifying intersectional bias. Specifically, Fairpriori is easier to use and interpret, supports a wider range of use cases by accommodating multiple fairness metrics, and exhibits higher efficiency in computing fairness metrics. These findings showcase Fairpriori's potential for effectively uncovering subgroups affected by intersectional bias, supported by its open-source tooling at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Fairpriori-0320.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2024.

Builds on

17 of 34 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  3. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  4. 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
  5. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  6. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  7. 2017Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discriminationcited by 123
  8. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  9. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 92
  10. 2022Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trendscited by 61
  11. 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
  12. 2023A Survey on Intersectional Fairness in Machine Learning: Notions, Mitigation, and Challengescited by 41
5 more
  1. 2021Towards the Right Kind of Fairness in AIcited by 15
  2. 2021Automatic Fairness Testing of Neural Classifiers through Adversarial Samplingcited by 14
  3. 2022TESTSGD: Interpretable Testing of Neural Networks Against Subtle Group Discriminationcited by 7
  4. 2023FairRec: Fairness Testing for Deep Recommender Systemscited by 3
  5. 2019Who wants accurate models? Arguing for a different metrics to take classification models seriouslycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.