mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Universal Adversarial Perturbations Through the Lens of Deep Steganography: Towards A Fourier Perspective

arXiv 2102.06479 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The booming interest in adversarial attacks stems from a misalignment between human vision and a deep neural network (DNN), i.e. a human imperceptible perturbation fools the DNN. Moreover, a single perturbation, often called universal adversarial perturbation (UAP), can be generated to fool the DNN for most images. A similar misalignment phenomenon has recently also been observed in the deep steganography task, where a decoder network can retrieve a secret image back from a slightly perturbed cover image. We attempt explaining the success of both in a unified manner from the Fourier perspective. We perform task-specific and joint analysis and reveal that (a) frequency is a key factor that influences their performance based on the proposed entropy metric for quantifying the frequency distribution; (b) their success can be attributed to a DNN being highly sensitive to high-frequency content. We also perform feature layer analysis for providing deep insight on model generalization and robustness. Additionally, we propose two new variants of universal perturbations: (1) Universal Secret Adversarial Perturbation (USAP) that simultaneously achieves attack and hiding; (2) high-pass UAP (HP-UAP) that is less visible to the human eye.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2021.

Builds on

51 of 72 references.

References · 51

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  6. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  7. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  9. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  10. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  12. 2014Understanding Deep Image Representations by Inverting Themcited by 403
38 more
  1. 2018HiDDeN: Hiding Data With Deep Networkscited by 397
  2. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  3. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  4. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  5. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  6. 2020Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervisioncited by 198
  7. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  8. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
  9. 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
  10. 2020Video Panoptic Segmentationcited by 142
  11. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  12. 2018Are adversarial examples inevitable?cited by 113
  13. 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 88
  14. 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
  15. 2018Universal Adversarial Trainingcited by 87
  16. 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 80
  17. 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
  18. 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
  19. 2018Shield: Fast, Practical Defense and Vaccination for Deep Learning using JPEG Compressioncited by 74
  20. 2016A Boundary Tilting Persepective on the Phenomenon of Adversarial Examplescited by 70
  21. 2020Understanding Adversarial Examples from the Mutual Influence of Images and Perturbationscited by 59
  22. 2017Generating Steganographic Images via Adversarial Trainingcited by 58
  23. 2019On the Effectiveness of Low Frequency Perturbationscited by 56
  24. 2020Revisiting Batch Normalization for Improving Corruption Robustnesscited by 55
  25. 2017Adversarial and Clean Data Are Not Twinscited by 52
  26. 2018The Curse of Concentration in Robust Learning: Evasion and Poisoning Attacks from Concentration of Measurecited by 46
  27. 2015Exploring the Space of Adversarial Imagescited by 28
  28. 2020CD-UAP: Class Discriminative Universal Adversarial Perturbationcited by 27
  29. 2020Double Targeted Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 23
  30. 2018With Friends Like These, Who Needs Adversaries?cited by 19
  31. 2017Robustness of classifiers to universal perturbations: a geometric perspectivecited by 15
  32. 2018The Effects of JPEG and JPEG2000 Compression on Attacks using Adversarial Examplescited by 12
  33. 2019Learning Residual Flow as Dynamic Motion from Stereo Videoscited by 12
  34. 2020ResNet or DenseNet? Introducing Dense Shortcuts to ResNetcited by 12
  35. 2018Feature Prioritization and Regularization Improve Standard Accuracy and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 5
  36. 2019Visuomotor Understanding for Representation Learning of Driving Scenescited by 5
  37. 2018Detecting Adversarial Examples - A Lesson from Multimedia Forensicscited by 2
  38. 2018Convolutional Video Steganography with Temporal Residual Modelingcited by 2

50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

18 papers.

Sort: