The Effects of JPEG and JPEG2000 Compression on Attacks using Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial examples are known to have a negative effect on the performance of classifiers which have otherwise good performance on undisturbed images. These examples are generated by adding non-random noise to the testing samples in order to make classifier misclassify the given data. Adversarial attacks use these intentionally generated examples and they pose a security risk to the machine learning based systems. To be immune to such attacks, it is desirable to have a pre-processing mechanism which removes these effects causing misclassification while keeping the content of the image. JPEG and JPEG2000 are well-known image compression techniques which suppress the high-frequency content taking the human visual system into account. JPEG has been also shown to be an effective method for reducing adversarial noise. In this paper, we propose applying JPEG2000 compression as an alternative and systematically compare the classification performance of adversarial images compressed using JPEG and JPEG2000 at different target PSNR values and maximum compression levels. Our experiments show that JPEG2000 is more effective in reducing adversarial noise as it allows higher compression rates with less distortion and it does not introduce blocking artifacts.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 4.
12 papers.
- 2021Universal Adversarial Perturbations Through the Lens of Deep Steganography: Towards A Fourier Perspectivecited by 18
- 2022Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks with Training-free Hybrid Image Transformationcited by 8
- 2024Coordinated Flaw Disclosure for AI: Beyond Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 8
- 2024PID: Prompt-Independent Data Protection Against Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 6
- 2022RoVISQ: Reduction of Video Service Quality via Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning-based Video Compressioncited by 4
- 2023Neural Image Compression: Generalization, Robustness, and Spectral Biasescited by 4
- 2024Machine Perceptual Quality: Evaluating the Impact of Severe Lossy Compression on Audio and Image Modelscited by 2
- 2024Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 2
- 2025Universal and Efficient Detection of Adversarial Data through Nonuniform Impact on Network Layerscited by 2
- 2025Training-Free Adversarial Robustness in Computational MRIcited by 0
- 2025Beyond Invisibility: Learning Robust Visible Watermarks for Stronger Copyright Protectioncited by 0
- 2025A Statistical Method for Attack-Agnostic Adversarial Attack Detection with Compressive Sensing Comparisoncited by 0
- 2025A Statistical Method for Attack-Agnostic Adversarial Attack Detection with Compressive Sensing Comparison3 Oct 2025
- 2025Universal and Efficient Detection of Adversarial Data through Nonuniform Impact on Network Layers25 Jun 2025
- 2025Beyond Invisibility: Learning Robust Visible Watermarks for Stronger Copyright Protection3 Jun 2025
- 2025Training-Free Adversarial Robustness in Computational MRI3 Jan 2025
- 2024Detecting Adversarial Examples22 Oct 2024
- 2024PID: Prompt-Independent Data Protection Against Latent Diffusion Models14 Jun 2024
- 2024Coordinated Flaw Disclosure for AI: Beyond Security Vulnerabilities10 Feb 2024
- 2024Machine Perceptual Quality: Evaluating the Impact of Severe Lossy Compression on Audio and Image Models15 Jan 2024
- 2023Neural Image Compression: Generalization, Robustness, and Spectral Biases17 Jul 2023
- 2022RoVISQ: Reduction of Video Service Quality via Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning-based Video Compression18 Mar 2022
- 2022Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks with Training-free Hybrid Image Transformation9 Mar 2022
- 2021Universal Adversarial Perturbations Through the Lens of Deep Steganography: Towards A Fourier Perspective12 Feb 2021