mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FairLens: Auditing Black-box Clinical Decision Support Systems

arXiv 2011.04049 ↗First posted 8 Nov 2020cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The pervasive application of algorithmic decision-making is raising concerns on the risk of unintended bias in AI systems deployed in critical settings such as healthcare. The detection and mitigation of biased models is a very delicate task which should be tackled with care and involving domain experts in the loop. In this paper we introduce FairLens, a methodology for discovering and explaining biases. We show how our tool can be used to audit a fictional commercial black-box model acting as a clinical decision support system. In this scenario, the healthcare facility experts can use FairLens on their own historical data to discover the model's biases before incorporating it into the clinical decision flow. FairLens first stratifies the available patient data according to attributes such as age, ethnicity, gender and insurance; it then assesses the model performance on such subgroups of patients identifying those in need of expert evaluation. Finally, building on recent state-of-the-art XAI (eXplainable Artificial Intelligence) techniques, FairLens explains which elements in patients' clinical history drive the model error in the selected subgroup. Therefore, FairLens allows experts to investigate whether to trust the model and to spotlight group-specific biases that might constitute potential fairness issues.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021To trust or not to trust an explanation: using LEAF to evaluate local linear XAI methodscited by 26
  2. 2021Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcarecited by 21
  3. 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AIcited by 16
  4. 2023A Survey on Deep Learning for Polyp Segmentation: Techniques, Challenges and Future Trendscited by 12
  5. 2024Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approachescited by 10
  6. 2021AcME -- Accelerated Model-agnostic Explanations: Fast Whitening of the Machine-Learning Black Boxcited by 9
  7. 2022Algorithmic audits of algorithms, and the lawcited by 9
  8. 2023Verifiable Fairness: Privacy-preserving Computation of Fairness for Machine Learning Systemscited by 7
  9. 2024Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online Fairnesscited by 7
  10. 2022GRAPHSHAP: Explaining Identity-Aware Graph Classifiers Through the Language of Motifscited by 6
  11. 2022TCM-SD: A Benchmark for Probing Syndrome Differentiation via Natural Language Processingcited by 6
  12. 2025PerFairX: Is There a Balance Between Fairness and Personality in Large Language Model Recommendations?cited by 3
11 more
  1. 2023Explainable AI is Responsible AI: How Explainability Creates Trustworthy and Socially Responsible Artificial Intelligencecited by 2
  2. 2024XAI4LLM. Let Machine Learning Models and LLMs Collaborate for Enhanced In-Context Learning in Healthcarecited by 2
  3. 2026FairLogue: A Toolkit for Intersectional Fairness Analysis in Clinical Machine Learning Modelscited by 2
  4. 2024Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecyclecited by 1
  5. 2025Size-adaptive Hypothesis Testing for Fairnesscited by 1
  6. 2026RISED: A Pre-Deployment Evaluation Framework for High-Stakes AI Decision-Support Systems, with Application to Healthcarecited by 1
  7. 2023Streamlining models with explanations in the learning loopcited by 0
  8. 2023FairComp: Workshop on Fairness and Robustness in Machine Learning for Ubiquitous Computingcited by 0
  9. 2024Fair Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines for Ensuring Equity and Transparencycited by 0
  10. 2026FairSelect: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Level and Intersectional Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 0
  11. 2026The Gold in Bias: Maturing the AI Design Process through Verificationcited by 0