Verifiable Fairness: Privacy-preserving Computation of Fairness for Machine Learning Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fair machine learning is a thriving and vibrant research topic. In this paper, we propose Fairness as a Service (FaaS), a secure, verifiable and privacy-preserving protocol to computes and verify the fairness of any machine learning (ML) model. In the deisgn of FaaS, the data and outcomes are represented through cryptograms to ensure privacy. Also, zero knowledge proofs guarantee the well-formedness of the cryptograms and underlying data. FaaS is model--agnostic and can support various fairness metrics; hence, it can be used as a service to audit the fairness of any ML model. Our solution requires no trusted third party or private channels for the computation of the fairness metric. The security guarantees and commitments are implemented in a way that every step is securely transparent and verifiable from the start to the end of the process. The cryptograms of all input data are publicly available for everyone, e.g., auditors, social activists and experts, to verify the correctness of the process. We implemented FaaS to investigate performance and demonstrate the successful use of FaaS for a publicly available data set with thousands of entries.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2023.
Builds on
13 of 35 references.
References · 13
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
- 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78
- 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
- 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
- 2018Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributescited by 41
- 2020FairLens: Auditing Black-box Clinical Decision Support Systemscited by 23
- 2020Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Modelscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Zero-Knowledge Proof-based Verifiable Decentralized Machine Learning in Communication Network: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 18
- 2024FairProof : Confidential and Certifiable Fairness for Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2024Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online Fairnesscited by 7
- 2025ExpProof : Operationalizing Explanations for Confidential Models with ZKPscited by 2
- 2025P2NIA: Privacy-Preserving Non-Iterative Auditingcited by 2
- 2026Certification of Machine Learning Models via Directional Sharpnesscited by 0
- 2026Certified but Private: Scalable Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Neural Network Guaranteescited by 0
- 2026Certified but Private: Scalable Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Neural Network Guarantees17 Aug 2026
- 2026Certification of Machine Learning Models via Directional Sharpness23 Jun 2026
- 2025P2NIA: Privacy-Preserving Non-Iterative Auditing1 Apr 2025
- 2025ExpProof : Operationalizing Explanations for Confidential Models with ZKPs6 Feb 2025
- 2024Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online Fairness17 Sep 2024
- 2024FairProof : Confidential and Certifiable Fairness for Neural Networks19 Feb 2024
- 2023Zero-Knowledge Proof-based Verifiable Decentralized Machine Learning in Communication Network: A Comprehensive Survey23 Oct 2023