mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online Fairness

arXiv 2410.02777 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2024cs.CY cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The black-box service model enables ML service providers to serve clients while keeping their intellectual property and client data confidential. Confidentiality is critical for delivering ML services legally and responsibly, but makes it difficult for outside parties to verify important model properties such as fairness. Existing methods that assess model fairness confidentially lack either (i) reliability because they certify fairness with respect to a static set of data, and therefore fail to guarantee fairness in the presence of distribution shift or service provider malfeasance; and/or (ii) scalability due to the computational overhead of confidentiality-preserving cryptographic primitives. We address these problems by introducing online fairness certificates, which verify that a model is fair with respect to data received by the service provider online during deployment. We then present OATH, a deployably efficient and scalable zero-knowledge proof protocol for confidential online group fairness certification. OATH exploits statistical properties of group fairness via a cut-and-choose style protocol, enabling scalability improvements over baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2024.

Builds on

20 of 53 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  3. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  4. 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 123
  5. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  6. 2019Fairwashing: the risk of rationalizationcited by 81
  7. 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
  8. 2018Training Well-Generalizing Classifiers for Fairness Metrics and Other Data-Dependent Constraintscited by 53
  9. 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  10. 2020Verifying Individual Fairness in Machine Learning Modelscited by 49
  11. 2018Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributescited by 41
  12. 2022Fairness Transferability Subject to Bounded Distribution Shiftcited by 28
8 more
  1. 2020FairLens: Auditing Black-box Clinical Decision Support Systemscited by 23
  2. 2020Ensuring Fairness under Prior Probability Shiftscited by 16
  3. 2020Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Modelscited by 16
  4. 2024FairProof : Confidential and Certifiable Fairness for Neural Networkscited by 13
  5. 2023Verifiable Fairness: Privacy-preserving Computation of Fairness for Machine Learning Systemscited by 7
  6. 2024Holding Secrets Accountable: Auditing Privacy-Preserving Machine Learningcited by 5
  7. 2022PrivFair: a Library for Privacy-Preserving Fairness Auditingcited by 4
  8. 2022Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interestcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.