mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Classification Under Human Assistance

arXiv 2006.11845 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2020stat.ML cs.LGcited by 42

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most supervised learning models are trained for full automation. However, their predictions are sometimes worse than those by human experts on some specific instances. Motivated by this empirical observation, our goal is to design classifiers that are optimized to operate under different automation levels. More specifically, we focus on convex margin-based classifiers and first show that the problem is NP-hard. Then, we further show that, for support vector machines, the corresponding objective function can be expressed as the difference of two functions f = g - c, where g is monotone, non-negative and γ-weakly submodular, and c is non-negative and modular. This representation allows a recently introduced deterministic greedy algorithm, as well as a more efficient randomized variant of the algorithm, to enjoy approximation guarantees at solving the problem. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data from several applications in medical diagnosis illustrate our theoretical findings and demonstrate that, under human assistance, supervised learning models trained to operate under different automation levels can outperform those trained for full automation as well as humans operating alone.

Key facts. Cited by 42 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 7; 2023: 6; 2024: 12; 2025: 6; 2026: 5.

42 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 108
  2. 2021Differentiable Learning Under Triagecited by 76
  3. 2022Improving Expert Predictions with Conformal Predictioncited by 54
  4. 2022Human-Algorithm Collaboration: Achieving Complementarity and Avoiding Unfairnesscited by 45
  5. 2022Forming Effective Human-AI Teams: Building Machine Learning Models that Complement the Capabilities of Multiple Expertscited by 40
  6. 2023Designing Decision Support Systems Using Counterfactual Prediction Setscited by 26
  7. 2023In Defense of Softmax Parametrization for Calibrated and Consistent Learning to Defercited by 26
  8. 2024Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to Defercited by 26
  9. 2023Learning to Defer with Limited Expert Predictionscited by 25
  10. 2024Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction Setscited by 25
  11. 2025Mastering Multiple-Expert Routing: Realizable H-Consistency and Strong Guarantees for Learning to Defercited by 16
  12. 2021Reinforcement Learning Under Algorithmic Triagecited by 15
30 more
  1. 2021Training Data Subset Selection for Regression with Controlled Generalization Errorcited by 14
  2. 2023Learning to Make Adherence-Aware Advicecited by 13
  3. 2024Human Expertise in Algorithmic Predictioncited by 13
  4. 2024A Causal Framework for Evaluating Deferring Systemscited by 13
  5. 2024Efficient Data Subset Selection to Generalize Training Across Models: Transductive and Inductive Networkscited by 13
  6. 2025Budgeted Multiple-Expert Deferralcited by 12
  7. 2021Improving Learning-to-Defer Algorithms Through Fine-Tuningcited by 11
  8. 2024Controlling Counterfactual Harm in Decision Support Systems Based on Prediction Setscited by 9
  9. 2022Efficient, Uncertainty-based Moderation of Neural Networks Text Classifierscited by 7
  10. 2024AI, Meet Human: Learning Paradigms for Hybrid Decision Making Systemscited by 7
  11. 2025Towards Human-AI Complementarity in Matching Taskscited by 7
  12. 2022Neural Estimation of Submodular Functions with Applications to Differentiable Subset Selectioncited by 6
  13. 2024A Unifying Post-Processing Framework for Multi-Objective Learn-to-Defer Problemscited by 5
  14. 2024Learning To Guide Human Decision Makers With Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
  15. 2024Collaborative Intelligence in Sequential Experiments: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Drug Discoverycited by 3
  16. 2024Integrating Expert Judgment and Algorithmic Decision Making: An Indistinguishability Frameworkcited by 3
  17. 2025Narrowing Action Choices with AI Improves Human Sequential Decisionscited by 3
  18. 2022Variable-Based Calibration for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 2
  19. 2023When No-Rejection Learning is Consistent for Regression with Rejectioncited by 2
  20. 2023Generator Assisted Mixture of Experts For Feature Acquisition in Batchcited by 2
  21. 2024Towards Non-Adversarial Algorithmic Recoursecited by 2
  22. 2025Knowing What You Cannot Explain: Learning to Reject Low-Quality Explanationscited by 2
  23. 2025Conformal Set-based Human-AI Complementarity with Multiple Expertscited by 2
  24. 2026When More Experts Hurt: Underfitting in Multi-Expert Learning to Defercited by 2
  25. 2026DeferredSeg:A Multi-Expert Deferral Framework for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1
  26. 2026Strategic Decision Support for AI Agentscited by 1
  27. 2021On some Foundational Aspects of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligencecited by 0
  28. 2022HEX: Human-in-the-loop Explainability via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  29. 2026Human-AI Teaming Through the Lens of Calibrationcited by 0
  30. 2026Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgetscited by 0