Reinforcement Learning Under Algorithmic Triage
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Methods to learn under algorithmic triage have predominantly focused on supervised learning settings where each decision, or prediction, is independent of each other. Under algorithmic triage, a supervised learning model predicts a fraction of the instances and humans predict the remaining ones. In this work, we take a first step towards developing reinforcement learning models that are optimized to operate under algorithmic triage. To this end, we look at the problem through the framework of options and develop a two-stage actor-critic method to learn reinforcement learning models under triage. The first stage performs offline, off-policy training using human data gathered in an environment where the human has operated on their own. The second stage performs on-policy training to account for the impact that switching may have on the human policy, which may be difficult to anticipate from the above human data. Extensive simulation experiments in a synthetic car driving task show that the machine models and the triage policies trained using our two-stage method effectively complement human policies and outperform those provided by several competitive baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2021.
Builds on
32 of 59 references.
References · 32
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2016The Option-Critic Architecturecited by 433
- 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 333
- 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 298
- 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 262
- 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 167
- 2020Learning to Complement Humanscited by 123
- 2018Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifierscited by 106
- 2015An Emphatic Approach to the Problem of Off-policy Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 103
- 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
- 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
- 2020Aligning Superhuman AI with Human Behavior: Chess as a Model Systemcited by 78
20 more
- 2021Differentiable Learning Under Triagecited by 74
- 2019Deep Gamblers: Learning to Abstain with Portfolio Theorycited by 69
- 2018Shared Autonomy via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2018Learning Policy Representations in Multiagent Systemscited by 48
- 2020Classification Under Human Assistancecited by 42
- 2019Regression Under Human Assistancecited by 40
- 2014Efficient Model Learning for Human-Robot Collaborative Taskscited by 35
- 2018An Off-policy Policy Gradient Theorem Using Emphatic Weightingscited by 34
- 2018Machine Teaching for Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms and Applicationscited by 28
- 2019Interactive Teaching Algorithms for Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2015On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 21
- 2018Teaching Inverse Reinforcement Learners via Features and Demonstrationscited by 19
- 2019Exploring applications of deep reinforcement learning for real-world autonomous driving systemscited by 18
- 2019Learner-aware Teaching: Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Preferences and Constraintscited by 18
- 2017The Atari Grand Challenge Datasetcited by 14
- 2019Learning to Collaborate in Markov Decision Processescited by 14
- 2018Safe Option-Critic: Learning Safety in the Option-Critic Architecturecited by 10
- 2020Learning Not to Learn in the Presence of Noisy Labelscited by 9
- 2020Is the Most Accurate AI the Best Teammate? Optimizing AI for Teamworkcited by 9
- 2017Mathematical Models of Adaptation in Human-Robot Collaborationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 4.
15 papers.
Sort:
- 2022Improving Expert Predictions with Conformal Predictioncited by 54
- 2022Sample Efficient Learning of Predictors that Complement Humanscited by 46
- 2023Principled Approaches for Learning to Defer with Multiple Expertscited by 38
- 2024Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to Defercited by 26
- 2024Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction Setscited by 25
- 2025Mastering Multiple-Expert Routing: Realizable H-Consistency and Strong Guarantees for Learning to Defercited by 16
- 2023Learning to Make Adherence-Aware Advicecited by 13
- 2025Budgeted Multiple-Expert Deferralcited by 11
- 2023Optimizing delegation between human and AI collaborative agentscited by 9
- 2024Controlling Counterfactual Harm in Decision Support Systems Based on Prediction Setscited by 9
- 2025Towards Human-AI Complementarity in Matching Taskscited by 7
- 2023Compensating for Sensing Failures via Delegation in Human-AI Hybrid Systemscited by 4
3 more
- 2025Budgeted Multiple-Expert Deferral30 Oct 2025
- 2025Narrowing Action Choices with AI Improves Human Sequential Decisions17 Oct 2025
- 2025Towards Human-AI Complementarity in Matching Tasks18 Aug 2025
- 2025Mastering Multiple-Expert Routing: Realizable H-Consistency and Strong Guarantees for Learning to Defer25 Jun 2025
- 2024Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to Defer18 Jul 2024
- 2024Controlling Counterfactual Harm in Decision Support Systems Based on Prediction Sets10 Jun 2024
- 2024Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction Sets27 May 2024
- 2024Optimizing Risk-averse Human-AI Hybrid Teams13 Mar 2024
- 2024Optimizing Delegation in Collaborative Human-AI Hybrid Teams8 Feb 2024
- 2023Principled Approaches for Learning to Defer with Multiple Experts23 Oct 2023
- 2023Learning to Make Adherence-Aware Advice1 Oct 2023
- 2023Optimizing delegation between human and AI collaborative agents26 Sep 2023
3 more
- 2022Improving Expert Predictions with Conformal Predictioncited by 54
- 2022Sample Efficient Learning of Predictors that Complement Humanscited by 46
- 2023Principled Approaches for Learning to Defer with Multiple Expertscited by 38
- 2024Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to Defercited by 26
- 2024Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction Setscited by 25
- 2025Mastering Multiple-Expert Routing: Realizable H-Consistency and Strong Guarantees for Learning to Defercited by 16
- 2023Learning to Make Adherence-Aware Advicecited by 13
- 2025Budgeted Multiple-Expert Deferralcited by 11
- 2023Optimizing delegation between human and AI collaborative agentscited by 9
- 2024Controlling Counterfactual Harm in Decision Support Systems Based on Prediction Setscited by 9
- 2025Towards Human-AI Complementarity in Matching Taskscited by 7
- 2023Compensating for Sensing Failures via Delegation in Human-AI Hybrid Systemscited by 4
12 most cited of 15 All 15 (JSON)
- 2025Budgeted Multiple-Expert Deferral30 Oct 2025
- 2025Narrowing Action Choices with AI Improves Human Sequential Decisions17 Oct 2025
- 2025Towards Human-AI Complementarity in Matching Tasks18 Aug 2025
- 2025Mastering Multiple-Expert Routing: Realizable H-Consistency and Strong Guarantees for Learning to Defer25 Jun 2025
- 2024Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to Defer18 Jul 2024
- 2024Controlling Counterfactual Harm in Decision Support Systems Based on Prediction Sets10 Jun 2024
- 2024Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction Sets27 May 2024
- 2024Optimizing Risk-averse Human-AI Hybrid Teams13 Mar 2024
- 2024Optimizing Delegation in Collaborative Human-AI Hybrid Teams8 Feb 2024
- 2023Principled Approaches for Learning to Defer with Multiple Experts23 Oct 2023
- 2023Learning to Make Adherence-Aware Advice1 Oct 2023
- 2023Optimizing delegation between human and AI collaborative agents26 Sep 2023
12 newest of 15 All 15 (JSON)