mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Conformal Set-based Human-AI Complementarity with Multiple Experts

arXiv 2508.06997 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decision support systems are designed to assist human experts in classification tasks by providing conformal prediction sets derived from a pre-trained model. This human-AI collaboration has demonstrated enhanced classification performance compared to using either the model or the expert independently. In this study, we focus on the selection of instance-specific experts from a pool of multiple human experts, contrasting it with existing research that typically focuses on single-expert scenarios. We characterize the conditions under which multiple experts can benefit from the conformal sets. With the insight that only certain experts may be relevant for each instance, we explore the problem of subset selection and introduce a greedy algorithm that utilizes conformal sets to identify the subset of expert predictions that will be used in classifying an instance. This approach is shown to yield better performance compared to naive methods for human subset selection. Based on real expert predictions from the CIFAR-10H and ImageNet-16H datasets, our simulation study indicates that our proposed greedy algorithm achieves near-optimal subsets, resulting in improved classification performance among multiple experts.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2025.

Builds on

22 of 53 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  3. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  4. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  5. 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
  6. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
  7. 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
  8. 2021Differentiable Learning Under Triagecited by 76
  9. 2022Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifierscited by 69
  10. 2022Improving Expert Predictions with Conformal Predictioncited by 54
  11. 2023LLM-Powered Hierarchical Language Agent for Real-time Human-AI Coordinationcited by 48
  12. 2022Sample Efficient Learning of Predictors that Complement Humanscited by 46
10 more
  1. 2019How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trustcited by 45
  2. 2020Classification Under Human Assistancecited by 42
  3. 2021Combining Human Predictions with Model Probabilities via Confusion Matrices and Calibrationcited by 40
  4. 2022Forming Effective Human-AI Teams: Building Machine Learning Models that Complement the Capabilities of Multiple Expertscited by 40
  5. 2023Principled Approaches for Learning to Defer with Multiple Expertscited by 38
  6. 2021Human-AI Collaboration with Bandit Feedbackcited by 36
  7. 2021Set-valued classification -- overview via a unified frameworkcited by 27
  8. 2020Misplaced Trust: Measuring the Interference of Machine Learning in Human Decision-Makingcited by 25
  9. 2023Learning to Defer with Limited Expert Predictionscited by 25
  10. 2024Towards Human-AI Complementarity with Prediction Setscited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.