Variable-Based Calibration for Machine Learning Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The deployment of machine learning classifiers in high-stakes domains requires well-calibrated confidence scores for model predictions. In this paper we introduce the notion of variable-based calibration to characterize calibration properties of a model with respect to a variable of interest, generalizing traditional score-based metrics such as expected calibration error (ECE). In particular, we find that models with near-perfect ECE can exhibit significant miscalibration as a function of features of the data. We demonstrate this phenomenon both theoretically and in practice on multiple well-known datasets, and show that it can persist after the application of existing calibration methods. To mitigate this issue, we propose strategies for detection, visualization, and quantification of variable-based calibration error. We then examine the limitations of current score-based calibration methods and explore potential modifications. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings, emphasizing that an understanding of calibration beyond simple aggregate measures is crucial for endeavors such as fairness and model interpretability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2022.
Builds on
13 of 34 references.
References · 13
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 165
- 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
- 2020Classification Under Human Assistancecited by 42
- 2019Field-aware Calibration: A Simple and Empirically Strong Method for Reliable Probabilistic Predictionscited by 19
1 more
- 2018Probability Calibration Treescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2023On the Richness of Calibrationcited by 9
- 2024Calibrating the Predictions for Top-N Recommendationscited by 2
- 2024Calibrating the Predictions for Top-N Recommendations21 Aug 2024
- 2023On the Richness of Calibration8 Feb 2023