mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Scheduling

arXiv 2004.08628 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2020cs.LG cs.CVcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models have shown impressive performance across a spectrum of computer vision applications including medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. One of the major concerns that these models face is their susceptibility to adversarial attacks. Realizing the importance of this issue, more researchers are working towards developing robust models that are less affected by adversarial attacks. Adversarial training method shows promising results in this direction. In adversarial training regime, models are trained with mini-batches augmented with adversarial samples. Fast and simple methods (e.g., single-step gradient ascent) are used for generating adversarial samples, in order to reduce computational complexity. It is shown that models trained using single-step adversarial training method (adversarial samples are generated using non-iterative method) are pseudo robust. Further, this pseudo robustness of models is attributed to the gradient masking effect. However, existing works fail to explain when and why gradient masking effect occurs during single-step adversarial training. In this work, (i) we show that models trained using single-step adversarial training method learn to prevent the generation of single-step adversaries, and this is due to over-fitting of the model during the initial stages of training, and (ii) to mitigate this effect, we propose a single-step adversarial training method with dropout scheduling. Unlike models trained using existing single-step adversarial training methods, models trained using the proposed single-step adversarial training method are robust against both single-step and multi-step adversarial attacks, and the performance is on par with models trained using computationally expensive multi-step adversarial training methods, in white-box and black-box settings.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 14; 2022: 9; 2023: 9; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

40 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  2. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
  3. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  4. 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 109
  5. 2022SegPGD: An Effective and Efficient Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Boosting Segmentation Robustnesscited by 74
  6. 2021Relating Adversarially Robust Generalization to Flat Minimacited by 57
  7. 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 42
  8. 2021Subspace Adversarial Trainingcited by 41
  9. 2021Reliably fast adversarial training via latent adversarial perturbationcited by 29
  10. 2022Towards Efficient Adversarial Training on Vision Transformerscited by 29
  11. 2023A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptionscited by 20
  12. 2021ZeroGrad : Mitigating and Explaining Catastrophic Overfitting in FGSM Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
28 more
  1. 2023Less is More: Data Pruning for Faster Adversarial Trainingcited by 13
  2. 2021Learning Diverse-Structured Networks for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 12
  3. 2023MIMIR: Masked Image Modeling for Mutual Information-based Adversarial Robustnesscited by 12
  4. 2021Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 11
  5. 2024Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularizationcited by 11
  6. 2024FuseFL: One-Shot Federated Learning through the Lens of Causality with Progressive Model Fusioncited by 11
  7. 2024Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut Dependencycited by 9
  8. 2021Guided Interpolation for Adversarial Trainingcited by 8
  9. 2021NoiLIn: Improving Adversarial Training and Correcting Stereotype of Noisy Labelscited by 8
  10. 2023Fast Propagation is Better: Accelerating Single-Step Adversarial Training via Sampling Subnetworkscited by 8
  11. 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Noise Augmentation: A Unified Perspective on RandStart and GradAligncited by 7
  12. 2022Designing and Training of Lightweight Neural Networks on Edge Devices using Early Halting in Knowledge Distillationcited by 7
  13. 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
  14. 2021Multi-stage Optimization based Adversarial Trainingcited by 4
  15. 2021Get Fooled for the Right Reason: Improving Adversarial Robustness through a Teacher-guided Curriculum Learning Approachcited by 4
  16. 2024On Using Certified Training towards Empirical Robustnesscited by 3
  17. 2022Rethinking Feature Uncertainty in Stochastic Neural Networks for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 2
  18. 2025Understanding Adversarial Training with Energy-based Modelscited by 2
  19. 2022Improving the Robustness and Generalization of Deep Neural Network with Confidence Threshold Reductioncited by 1
  20. 2023Do we need entire training data for adversarial training?cited by 1
  21. 2023Adversarial-Aware Deep Learning System based on a Secondary Classical Machine Learning Verification Approachcited by 1
  22. 2021Robust Single-step Adversarial Training with Regularizercited by 0
  23. 2021Robustifying ℓ_∞ Adversarial Training to the Union of Perturbation Modelscited by 0
  24. 2022Stable and Efficient Adversarial Training through Local Linearizationcited by 0
  25. 2023Explainability and Robustness of Deep Visual Classification Modelscited by 0
  26. 2023Fix your downsampling ASAP! Be natively more robust via Aliasing and Spectral Artifact free Poolingcited by 0
  27. 2024Improving Fast Adversarial Training Paradigm: An Example Taxonomy Perspectivecited by 0
  28. 2026Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting Robustnesscited by 0