mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

NoiLIn: Improving Adversarial Training and Correcting Stereotype of Noisy Labels

arXiv 2105.14676 ↗First posted 31 May 2021cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training (AT) formulated as the minimax optimization problem can effectively enhance the model's robustness against adversarial attacks. The existing AT methods mainly focused on manipulating the inner maximization for generating quality adversarial variants or manipulating the outer minimization for designing effective learning objectives. However, empirical results of AT always exhibit the robustness at odds with accuracy and the existence of the cross-over mixture problem, which motivates us to study some label randomness for benefiting the AT. First, we thoroughly investigate noisy labels (NLs) injection into AT's inner maximization and outer minimization, respectively and obtain the observations on when NL injection benefits AT. Second, based on the observations, we propose a simple but effective method -- NoiLIn that randomly injects NLs into training data at each training epoch and dynamically increases the NL injection rate once robust overfitting occurs. Empirically, NoiLIn can significantly mitigate the AT's undesirable issue of robust overfitting and even further improve the generalization of the state-of-the-art AT methods. Philosophically, NoiLIn sheds light on a new perspective of learning with NLs: NLs should not always be deemed detrimental, and even in the absence of NLs in the training set, we may consider injecting them deliberately. Codes are available in https://github.com/zjfheart/NoiLIn.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 92 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2021.

Builds on

92 of 115 references.

References · 92

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  7. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  8. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  9. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  10. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  11. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  12. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
38 more
  1. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  2. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  3. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  4. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  5. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  6. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
  7. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
  8. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  9. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  10. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  11. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  12. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  13. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  14. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  15. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  16. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 293
  17. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
  18. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
  19. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
  20. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  21. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  22. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
  23. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
  24. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 200
  25. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  26. 2018Lipschitz-Margin Training: Scalable Certification of Perturbation Invariance for Deep Neural Networkscited by 195
  27. 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 185
  28. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 183
  29. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 182
  30. 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
  31. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
  32. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 172
  33. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
  34. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 163
  35. 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 153
  36. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
  37. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  38. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144

50 most cited of 92 All 92 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

8 papers.