NoiLIn: Improving Adversarial Training and Correcting Stereotype of Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial training (AT) formulated as the minimax optimization problem can effectively enhance the model's robustness against adversarial attacks. The existing AT methods mainly focused on manipulating the inner maximization for generating quality adversarial variants or manipulating the outer minimization for designing effective learning objectives. However, empirical results of AT always exhibit the robustness at odds with accuracy and the existence of the cross-over mixture problem, which motivates us to study some label randomness for benefiting the AT. First, we thoroughly investigate noisy labels (NLs) injection into AT's inner maximization and outer minimization, respectively and obtain the observations on when NL injection benefits AT. Second, based on the observations, we propose a simple but effective method -- NoiLIn that randomly injects NLs into training data at each training epoch and dynamically increases the NL injection rate once robust overfitting occurs. Empirically, NoiLIn can significantly mitigate the AT's undesirable issue of robust overfitting and even further improve the generalization of the state-of-the-art AT methods. Philosophically, NoiLIn sheds light on a new perspective of learning with NLs: NLs should not always be deemed detrimental, and even in the absence of NLs in the training set, we may consider injecting them deliberately. Codes are available in https://github.com/zjfheart/NoiLIn.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 92 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2021.
Builds on
92 of 115 references.
References · 92
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
38 more
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 293
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
- 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
- 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
- 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 200
- 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
- 2018Lipschitz-Margin Training: Scalable Certification of Perturbation Invariance for Deep Neural Networkscited by 195
- 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 185
- 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 183
- 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 182
- 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
- 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
- 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 172
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
- 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 163
- 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 153
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
- 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
50 most cited of 92 All 92 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2025Accurate Forgetting for Heterogeneous Federated Continual Learningcited by 11
- 2022SRoUDA: Meta Self-training for Robust Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 6
- 2023Fairness Improves Learning from Noisily Labeled Long-Tailed Datacited by 5
- 2022Adversarial Training with Complementary Labels: On the Benefit of Gradually Informative Attackscited by 4
- 2024Enhancing the Resilience of Graph Neural Networks to Topological Perturbations in Sparse Graphscited by 3
- 2024Revisiting Semi-supervised Adversarial Robustness via Noise-aware Online Robust Distillationcited by 1
- 2021Adv-4-Adv: Thwarting Changing Adversarial Perturbations via Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 0
- 2024Towards Trustworthy Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Representation Learning Perspective for Enhancing Robustness, Discrimination, and Generalizationcited by 0
- 2025Accurate Forgetting for Heterogeneous Federated Continual Learning20 Feb 2025
- 2024Revisiting Semi-supervised Adversarial Robustness via Noise-aware Online Robust Distillation19 Sep 2024
- 2024Towards Trustworthy Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Representation Learning Perspective for Enhancing Robustness, Discrimination, and Generalization19 Jun 2024
- 2024Enhancing the Resilience of Graph Neural Networks to Topological Perturbations in Sparse Graphs5 Jun 2024
- 2023Fairness Improves Learning from Noisily Labeled Long-Tailed Data22 Mar 2023
- 2022SRoUDA: Meta Self-training for Robust Unsupervised Domain Adaptation12 Dec 2022
- 2022Adversarial Training with Complementary Labels: On the Benefit of Gradually Informative Attacks1 Nov 2022
- 2021Adv-4-Adv: Thwarting Changing Adversarial Perturbations via Adversarial Domain Adaptation1 Dec 2021