Improving the Robustness and Generalization of Deep Neural Network with Confidence Threshold Reduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are easily attacked by imperceptible perturbation. Presently, adversarial training (AT) is the most effective method to enhance the robustness of the model against adversarial examples. However, because adversarial training solved a min-max value problem, in comparison with natural training, the robustness and generalization are contradictory, i.e., the robustness improvement of the model will decrease the generalization of the model. To address this issue, in this paper, a new concept, namely confidence threshold (CT), is introduced and the reducing of the confidence threshold, known as confidence threshold reduction (CTR), is proven to improve both the generalization and robustness of the model. Specifically, to reduce the CT for natural training (i.e., for natural training with CTR), we propose a mask-guided divergence loss function (MDL) consisting of a cross-entropy loss term and an orthogonal term. The empirical and theoretical analysis demonstrates that the MDL loss improves the robustness and generalization of the model simultaneously for natural training. However, the model robustness improvement of natural training with CTR is not comparable to that of adversarial training. Therefore, for adversarial training, we propose a standard deviation loss function (STD), which minimizes the difference in the probabilities of the wrong categories, to reduce the CT by being integrated into the loss function of adversarial training. The empirical and theoretical analysis demonstrates that the STD based loss function can further improve the robustness of the adversarially trained model on basis of guaranteeing the changeless or slight improvement of the natural accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2022.
Builds on
47 of 68 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
35 more
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2019Reducing Transformer Depth on Demand with Structured Dropoutcited by 434
- 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 261
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
- 2019Knowledge-aware Graph Neural Networks with Label Smoothness Regularization for Recommender Systemscited by 107
- 2020Certified Robustness to Label-Flipping Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 103
- 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
- 2018Generalizable Data-free Objective for Crafting Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 88
- 2020The Implicit and Explicit Regularization Effects of Dropoutcited by 71
- 2019Efficient Adversarial Training with Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 54
- 2020TaskNorm: Rethinking Batch Normalization for Meta-Learningcited by 50
- 2021Is Label Smoothing Truly Incompatible with Knowledge Distillation: An Empirical Studycited by 50
- 2020Universal Adversarial Attack on Attention and the Resulting Dataset DAmageNetcited by 45
- 2020Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Schedulingcited by 40
- 2018Understanding the Disharmony between Dropout and Batch Normalization by Variance Shiftcited by 36
- 2021AutoDropout: Learning Dropout Patterns to Regularize Deep Networkscited by 35
- 2020Interpreting and Boosting Dropout from a Game-Theoretic Viewcited by 34
- 2019Four Things Everyone Should Know to Improve Batch Normalizationcited by 28
- 2015Dropout as data augmentationcited by 27
- 2020Dropout: Explicit Forms and Capacity Controlcited by 27
- 2021Contextual Dropout: An Efficient Sample-Dependent Dropout Modulecited by 26
- 2019Message-Dropout: An Efficient Training Method for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2018Guided Dropoutcited by 14
- 2019Multi-Sample Dropout for Accelerated Training and Better Generalizationcited by 14
- 2019On the Regularization Properties of Structured Dropoutcited by 5
- 2020Beyond Dropout: Feature Map Distortion to Regularize Deep Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2019Adversarial Dropout for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.