mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ZeroGrad : Mitigating and Explaining Catastrophic Overfitting in FGSM Adversarial Training

arXiv 2103.15476 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Making deep neural networks robust to small adversarial noises has recently been sought in many applications. Adversarial training through iterative projected gradient descent (PGD) has been established as one of the mainstream ideas to achieve this goal. However, PGD is computationally demanding and often prohibitive in case of large datasets and models. For this reason, single-step PGD, also known as FGSM, has recently gained interest in the field. Unfortunately, FGSM-training leads to a phenomenon called ``catastrophic overfitting," which is a sudden drop in the adversarial accuracy under the PGD attack. In this paper, we support the idea that small input gradients play a key role in this phenomenon, and hence propose to zero the input gradient elements that are small for crafting FGSM attacks. Our proposed idea, while being simple and efficient, achieves competitive adversarial accuracy on various datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2021.

Builds on

15 of 17 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  4. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  5. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
  6. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  7. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  8. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  9. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  10. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  11. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
  12. 2020Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbationscited by 55
3 more
  1. 2020Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Schedulingcited by 40
  2. 2020Towards Understanding Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 32
  3. 2020Regularizers for Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: