mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Single-step Adversarial Training with Regularizer

arXiv 2102.03381 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High cost of training time caused by multi-step adversarial example generation is a major challenge in adversarial training. Previous methods try to reduce the computational burden of adversarial training using single-step adversarial example generation schemes, which can effectively improve the efficiency but also introduce the problem of catastrophic overfitting, where the robust accuracy against Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) can achieve nearby 100% whereas the robust accuracy against Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) suddenly drops to 0% over a single epoch. To address this problem, we propose a novel Fast Gradient Sign Method with PGD Regularization (FGSMPR) to boost the efficiency of adversarial training without catastrophic overfitting. Our core idea is that single-step adversarial training can not learn robust internal representations of FGSM and PGD adversarial examples. Therefore, we design a PGD regularization term to encourage similar embeddings of FGSM and PGD adversarial examples. The experiments demonstrate that our proposed method can train a robust deep network for L_∞-perturbations with FGSM adversarial training and reduce the gap to multi-step adversarial training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2021.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  6. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  7. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  8. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
  9. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  10. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  11. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  12. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
10 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
  2. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  3. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  4. 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
  5. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  6. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  7. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  8. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  9. 2020Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Schedulingcited by 40
  10. 2020Towards Understanding Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.