Guided Interpolation for Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To enhance adversarial robustness, adversarial training learns deep neural networks on the adversarial variants generated by their natural data. However, as the training progresses, the training data becomes less and less attackable, undermining the robustness enhancement. A straightforward remedy is to incorporate more training data, but sometimes incurring an unaffordable cost. In this paper, to mitigate this issue, we propose the guided interpolation framework (GIF): in each epoch, the GIF employs the previous epoch's meta information to guide the data's interpolation. Compared with the vanilla mixup, the GIF can provide a higher ratio of attackable data, which is beneficial to the robustness enhancement; it meanwhile mitigates the model's linear behavior between classes, where the linear behavior is favorable to generalization but not to the robustness. As a result, the GIF encourages the model to predict invariantly in the cluster of each class. Experiments demonstrate that the GIF can indeed enhance adversarial robustness on various adversarial training methods and various datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2021.
Builds on
35 of 51 references.
References · 35
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
23 more
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
- 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
- 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
- 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
- 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
- 2021Co-Mixup: Saliency Guided Joint Mixup with Supermodular Diversitycited by 127
- 2016Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 89
- 2018Curriculum Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
- 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
- 2019Mixup Inference: Better Exploiting Mixup to Defend Adversarial Attackscited by 54
- 2019Robustness to Adversarial Perturbations in Learning from Incomplete Datacited by 49
- 2019Interpolated Adversarial Training: Achieving Robust Neural Networks without Sacrificing Too Much Accuracycited by 49
- 2020Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Schedulingcited by 40
- 2020Addressing Neural Network Robustness with Mixup and Targeted Labeling Adversarial Trainingcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022Understanding Robust Overfitting of Adversarial Training and Beyondcited by 50
- 2022Sparsity Winning Twice: Better Robust Generalization from More Efficient Trainingcited by 41
- 2022A Survey of Mix-based Data Augmentation: Taxonomy, Methods, Applications, and Explainabilitycited by 30
- 2022Robust Weight Perturbation for Adversarial Trainingcited by 25
- 2023Certified Robust Neural Networks: Generalization and Corruption Resistancecited by 11
- 2021MixACM: Mixup-Based Robustness Transfer via Distillation of Activated Channel Mapscited by 9
- 2024Conserve-Update-Revise to Cure Generalization and Robustness Trade-off in Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
- 2024The Effectiveness of Random Forgetting for Robust Generalizationcited by 2
- 2024The Effectiveness of Random Forgetting for Robust Generalization18 Feb 2024
- 2024Conserve-Update-Revise to Cure Generalization and Robustness Trade-off in Adversarial Training26 Jan 2024
- 2023Certified Robust Neural Networks: Generalization and Corruption Resistance3 Mar 2023
- 2022A Survey of Mix-based Data Augmentation: Taxonomy, Methods, Applications, and Explainability21 Dec 2022
- 2022Understanding Robust Overfitting of Adversarial Training and Beyond17 Jun 2022
- 2022Robust Weight Perturbation for Adversarial Training30 May 2022
- 2022Sparsity Winning Twice: Better Robust Generalization from More Efficient Training20 Feb 2022
- 2021MixACM: Mixup-Based Robustness Transfer via Distillation of Activated Channel Maps9 Nov 2021