mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization

arXiv 2404.08154 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2024cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Single-step adversarial training (SSAT) has demonstrated the potential to achieve both efficiency and robustness. However, SSAT suffers from catastrophic overfitting (CO), a phenomenon that leads to a severely distorted classifier, making it vulnerable to multi-step adversarial attacks. In this work, we observe that some adversarial examples generated on the SSAT-trained network exhibit anomalous behaviour, that is, although these training samples are generated by the inner maximization process, their associated loss decreases instead, which we named abnormal adversarial examples (AAEs). Upon further analysis, we discover a close relationship between AAEs and classifier distortion, as both the number and outputs of AAEs undergo a significant variation with the onset of CO. Given this observation, we re-examine the SSAT process and uncover that before the occurrence of CO, the classifier already displayed a slight distortion, indicated by the presence of few AAEs. Furthermore, the classifier directly optimizing these AAEs will accelerate its distortion, and correspondingly, the variation of AAEs will sharply increase as a result. In such a vicious circle, the classifier rapidly becomes highly distorted and manifests as CO within a few iterations. These observations motivate us to eliminate CO by hindering the generation of AAEs. Specifically, we design a novel method, termed Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization (AAER), which explicitly regularizes the variation of AAEs to hinder the classifier from becoming distorted. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method can effectively eliminate CO and further boost adversarial robustness with negligible additional computational overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2024.

Builds on

36 of 50 references.

References · 36

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  5. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  10. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  11. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  12. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
24 more
  1. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  2. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  3. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Drivingcited by 401
  4. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  5. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  6. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  7. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
  8. 2022Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Adaptive Test-time Defensescited by 64
  9. 2020Guided Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Enhancing Adversarial Defensescited by 61
  10. 2022Understanding Robust Overfitting of Adversarial Training and Beyondcited by 50
  11. 2022Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function Perspectivecited by 48
  12. 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 42
  13. 2021Subspace Adversarial Trainingcited by 41
  14. 2020Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Schedulingcited by 40
  15. 2021Boosting Fast Adversarial Training with Learnable Adversarial Initializationcited by 40
  16. 2022Prior-Guided Adversarial Initialization for Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 34
  17. 2021Reliably fast adversarial training via latent adversarial perturbationcited by 29
  18. 2023Robust Generalization against Photon-Limited Corruptions via Worst-Case Sharpness Minimizationcited by 29
  19. 2022Robust Weight Perturbation for Adversarial Trainingcited by 25
  20. 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Adaptive Step Sizecited by 24
  21. 2021ZeroGrad : Mitigating and Explaining Catastrophic Overfitting in FGSM Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
  22. 2022Improving Adversarial Robustness via Mutual Information Estimationcited by 13
  23. 2019Deep learning and face recognition: the state of the artcited by 11
  24. 2021Multi-stage Optimization based Adversarial Trainingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

11 papers.