mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reliably fast adversarial training via latent adversarial perturbation

arXiv 2104.01575 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2021cs.LGcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While multi-step adversarial training is widely popular as an effective defense method against strong adversarial attacks, its computational cost is notoriously expensive, compared to standard training. Several single-step adversarial training methods have been proposed to mitigate the above-mentioned overhead cost; however, their performance is not sufficiently reliable depending on the optimization setting. To overcome such limitations, we deviate from the existing input-space-based adversarial training regime and propose a single-step latent adversarial training method (SLAT), which leverages the gradients of latent representation as the latent adversarial perturbation. We demonstrate that the L1 norm of feature gradients is implicitly regularized through the adopted latent perturbation, thereby recovering local linearity and ensuring reliable performance, compared to the existing single-step adversarial training methods. Because latent perturbation is based on the gradients of the latent representations which can be obtained for free in the process of input gradients computation, the proposed method costs roughly the same time as the fast gradient sign method. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed method, despite its structural simplicity, outperforms state-of-the-art accelerated adversarial training methods.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2021.

Builds on

37 of 45 references.

References · 37

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  6. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  7. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  8. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  9. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  10. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  11. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  12. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
25 more
  1. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  2. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  3. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  4. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  5. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  6. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
  7. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  8. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  9. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  10. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  11. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  12. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 204
  13. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
  14. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
  15. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
  16. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  17. 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
  18. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
  19. 2020Single-step Adversarial training with Dropout Schedulingcited by 40
  20. 2020Explicit Regularisation in Gaussian Noise Injectionscited by 37
  21. 2018Evaluating and Understanding the Robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 34
  22. 2020Towards Understanding Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 32
  23. 2019Harnessing the Vulnerability of Latent Layers in Adversarially Trained Modelscited by 26
  24. 2017Regularizing deep networks using efficient layerwise adversarial trainingcited by 24
  25. 2019Label Smoothing and Logit Squeezing: A Replacement for Adversarial Training?cited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 7; 2023: 3; 2024: 11; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

29 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
  2. 2024Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Auditscited by 123
  3. 2024Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Trainingcited by 82
  4. 2022SegPGD: An Effective and Efficient Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Boosting Segmentation Robustnesscited by 74
  5. 2022A Survey of Robust Adversarial Training in Pattern Recognition: Fundamental, Theory, and Methodologiescited by 44
  6. 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 42
  7. 2022Prior-Guided Adversarial Initialization for Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 34
  8. 2022Towards Efficient Adversarial Training on Vision Transformerscited by 29
  9. 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Adaptive Step Sizecited by 24
  10. 2023Fast Adversarial Training with Smooth Convergencecited by 14
  11. 2024Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularizationcited by 11
  12. 2024Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut Dependencycited by 9
17 more
  1. 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Noise Augmentation: A Unified Perspective on RandStart and GradAligncited by 7
  2. 2024Efficient local linearity regularization to overcome catastrophic overfittingcited by 7
  3. 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
  4. 2024Catastrophic Overfitting: A Potential Blessing in Disguisecited by 4
  5. 2025Beyond Vulnerabilities: A Survey of Adversarial Attacks as Both Threats and Defenses in Computer Vision Systemscited by 4
  6. 2024On Using Certified Training towards Empirical Robustnesscited by 3
  7. 2025Kernel Learning with Adversarial Features: Numerical Efficiency and Adaptive Regularizationcited by 3
  8. 2024Improving Fast Adversarial Training via Self-Knowledge Guidancecited by 2
  9. 2025Adversarially Pretrained Transformers May Be Universally Robust In-Context Learnerscited by 2
  10. 2025Understanding Adversarial Training with Energy-based Modelscited by 2
  11. 2023Latent Feature Relation Consistency for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 1
  12. 2026Mitigating Error Amplification in Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 1
  13. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Generative Autoencoders in the Latent Spacecited by 0
  14. 2024Towards Understanding Dual BN In Hybrid Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
  15. 2025Are Fast Methods Stable in Adversarially Robust Transfer Learning?cited by 0
  16. 2026Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting Robustnesscited by 0
  17. 2026Unveiling the Backdoor Mechanism Hidden Behind Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 0