Assessing Bias in Face Image Quality Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Face image quality assessment (FIQA) attempts to improve face recognition (FR) performance by providing additional information about sample quality. Because FIQA methods attempt to estimate the utility of a sample for face recognition, it is reasonable to assume that these methods are heavily influenced by the underlying face recognition system. Although modern face recognition systems are known to perform well, several studies have found that such systems often exhibit problems with demographic bias. It is therefore likely that such problems are also present with FIQA techniques. To investigate the demographic biases associated with FIQA approaches, this paper presents a comprehensive study involving a variety of quality assessment methods (general-purpose image quality assessment, supervised face quality assessment, and unsupervised face quality assessment methods) and three diverse state-of-theart FR models. Our analysis on the Balanced Faces in the Wild (BFW) dataset shows that all techniques considered are affected more by variations in race than sex. While the general-purpose image quality assessment methods appear to be less biased with respect to the two demographic factors considered, the supervised and unsupervised face image quality assessment methods both show strong bias with a tendency to favor white individuals (of either sex). In addition, we found that methods that are less racially biased perform worse overall. This suggests that the observed bias in FIQA methods is to a significant extent related to the underlying face recognition system.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2022.
Builds on
16 of 28 references.
References · 16
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
- 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 334
- 2019Probabilistic Face Embeddingscited by 173
- 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 151
- 2020SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustnesscited by 112
- 2018Deep Imbalanced Learning for Face Recognition and Attribute Predictioncited by 91
- 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
- 2020Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Surveycited by 80
- 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiabilitycited by 69
- 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 64
- 2019FaceQnet: Quality Assessment for Face Recognition based on Deep Learningcited by 62
4 more
- 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
- 2020Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 31
- 2017Strengths and Weaknesses of Deep Learning Models for Face Recognition Against Image Degradationscited by 19
- 2020Inducing Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Face Recognitioncited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Are Explainability Tools Gender Biased? A Case Study on Face Presentation Attack Detectioncited by 6
- 2023Improving the Accuracy of Beauty Product Recommendations by Assessing Face Illumination Qualitycited by 1
- 2024Fairness measures for biometric quality assessmentcited by 1
- 2023Quality-Aware Prototype Memory for Face Representation Learningcited by 0
- 2025Eye Sclera for Fair Face Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2025Eye Sclera for Fair Face Image Quality Assessment13 Jan 2025
- 2024Fairness measures for biometric quality assessment21 Aug 2024
- 2023Quality-Aware Prototype Memory for Face Representation Learning13 Nov 2023
- 2023Improving the Accuracy of Beauty Product Recommendations by Assessing Face Illumination Quality7 Sep 2023
- 2023Are Explainability Tools Gender Biased? A Case Study on Face Presentation Attack Detection26 Apr 2023