mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Impact of Racial Distribution in Training Data on Face Recognition Bias: A Closer Look

arXiv 2211.14498 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.CY cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face recognition algorithms, when used in the real world, can be very useful, but they can also be dangerous when biased toward certain demographics. So, it is essential to understand how these algorithms are trained and what factors affect their accuracy and fairness to build better ones. In this study, we shed some light on the effect of racial distribution in the training data on the performance of face recognition models. We conduct 16 different experiments with varying racial distributions of faces in the training data. We analyze these trained models using accuracy metrics, clustering metrics, UMAP projections, face quality, and decision thresholds. We show that a uniform distribution of races in the training datasets alone does not guarantee bias-free face recognition algorithms and how factors like face image quality play a crucial role. We also study the correlation between the clustering metrics and bias to understand whether clustering is a good indicator of bias. Finally, we introduce a metric called racial gradation to study the inter and intra race correlation in facial features and how they affect the learning ability of the face recognition models. With this study, we try to bring more understanding to an essential element of face recognition training, the data. A better understanding of the impact of training data on the bias of face recognition algorithms will aid in creating better datasets and, in turn, better face recognition systems.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2022.

Builds on

15 of 42 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  5. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  6. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 624
  7. 2014Deep Learning Face Representation by Joint Identification-Verificationcited by 162
  8. 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
  9. 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
  10. 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
  11. 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 64
  12. 2020Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 31
3 more
  1. 2017Empirically Analyzing the Effect of Dataset Biases on Deep Face Recognition Systemscited by 28
  2. 2019Deep Learning for Face Recognition: Pride or Prejudiced?cited by 25
  3. 2021Learning Fair Face Representation With Progressive Cross Transformercited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.