Does lossy image compression affect racial bias within face recognition?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Yes - This study investigates the impact of commonplace lossy image compression on face recognition algorithms with regard to the racial characteristics of the subject. We adopt a recently proposed racial phenotype-based bias analysis methodology to measure the effect of varying levels of lossy compression across racial phenotype categories. Additionally, we determine the relationship between chroma-subsampling and race-related phenotypes for recognition performance. Prior work investigates the impact of lossy JPEG compression algorithm on contemporary face recognition performance. However, there is a gap in how this impact varies with different race-related inter-sectional groups and the cause of this impact. Via an extensive experimental setup, we demonstrate that common lossy image compression approaches have a more pronounced negative impact on facial recognition performance for specific racial phenotype categories such as darker skin tones (by up to 34.55%). Furthermore, removing chroma-subsampling during compression improves the false matching rate (up to 15.95%) across all phenotype categories affected by the compression, including darker skin tones, wide noses, big lips, and monolid eye categories. In addition, we outline the characteristics that may be attributable as the underlying cause of such phenomenon for lossy compression algorithms such as JPEG.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2022.
Builds on
25 of 46 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 124
- 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 107
- 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
- 2020Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditingcited by 89
- 2020Mitigating Face Recognition Bias via Group Adaptive Classifiercited by 67
- 2016Examining the Impact of Blur on Recognition by Convolutional Networkscited by 58
- 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
13 more
- 2022Meta Balanced Network for Fair Face Recognitioncited by 53
- 2018Towards Image Understanding from Deep Compression without Decodingcited by 52
- 2020SensitiveLoss: Improving Accuracy and Fairness of Face Representations with Discrimination-Aware Deep Learningcited by 50
- 2020Exploring Racial Bias within Face Recognition via per-subject Adversarially-Enabled Data Augmentationcited by 45
- 2020Biometric Quality: Review and Application to Face Recognition with FaceQnetcited by 41
- 2020Face Quality Estimation and Its Correlation to Demographic and Non-Demographic Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 31
- 2020FairFace Challenge at ECCV 2020: Analyzing Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 26
- 2016How Image Degradations Affect Deep CNN-based Face Recognition?cited by 20
- 2021Measuring Hidden Bias within Face Recognition via Racial Phenotypescited by 16
- 2020On the Impact of Lossy Image and Video Compression on the Performance of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Architecturescited by 11
- 2021Unravelling the Effect of Image Distortions for Biased Prediction of Pre-trained Face Recognition Modelscited by 11
- 2022Fair SA: Sensitivity Analysis for Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 11
- 2018Quality Classified Image Analysis with Application to Face Detection and Recognitioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Racial Bias within Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 9
- 2025Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 7
- 2026Who Gets Flagged? The Pluralistic Evaluation Gap in AI Content Watermarkingcited by 2
- 2025Gone With the Bits: Revealing Racial Bias in Low-Rate Neural Compression for Facial Imagescited by 1
- 2025Switchable Token-Specific Codebook Quantization For Face Image Compressioncited by 1
- 2026Who Gets Flagged? The Pluralistic Evaluation Gap in AI Content Watermarking15 Apr 2026
- 2025Switchable Token-Specific Codebook Quantization For Face Image Compression27 Oct 2025
- 2025Gone With the Bits: Revealing Racial Bias in Low-Rate Neural Compression for Facial Images5 May 2025
- 2025Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition4 Feb 2025
- 2023Racial Bias within Face Recognition: A Survey1 May 2023