mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Designing Fair Ranking Schemes

arXiv 1712.09752 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2017cs.DBcited by 40

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Items from a database are often ranked based on a combination of multiple criteria. A user may have the flexibility to accept combinations that weigh these criteria differently, within limits. On the other hand, this choice of weights can greatly affect the fairness of the produced ranking. In this paper, we develop a system that helps users choose criterion weights that lead to greater fairness. We consider ranking functions that compute the score of each item as a weighted sum of (numeric) attribute values, and then sort items on their score. Each ranking function can be expressed as a vector of weights, or as a point in a multi-dimensional space. For a broad range of fairness criteria, we show how to efficiently identify regions in this space that satisfy these criteria. Using this identification method, our system is able to tell users whether their proposed ranking function satisfies the desired fairness criteria and, if it does not, to suggest the smallest modification that does. We develop user-controllable approximation that and indexing techniques that are applied during preprocessing, and support sub-second response times during the online phase. Our extensive experiments on real datasets demonstrate that our methods are able to find solutions that satisfy fairness criteria effectively and efficiently.

Key facts. Cited by 40 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 13; 2023: 10; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

40 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
  2. 2021Fairness in Ranking under Uncertaintycited by 27
  3. 2022Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applicationscited by 27
  4. 2022Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directionscited by 21
  5. 2021Maxmin-Fair Ranking: Individual Fairness under Group-Fairness Constraintscited by 18
  6. 2024Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankerscited by 17
  7. 2021Through the Data Management Lens: Experimental Analysis and Evaluation of Fair Classificationcited by 13
  8. 2022Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in Rankingcited by 13
  9. 2021Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilitiescited by 9
  10. 2022Debiasing Learning for Membership Inference Attacks Against Recommender Systemscited by 9
  11. 2023Through the Fairness Lens: Experimental Analysis and Evaluation of Entity Matchingcited by 9
  12. 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rankcited by 8
28 more
  1. 2021Individually Fair Rankingcited by 7
  2. 2023Modeling Recommender Ecosystems: Research Challenges at the Intersection of Mechanism Design, Reinforcement Learning and Generative Modelscited by 7
  3. 2021Fairness for Robust Learning to Rankcited by 6
  4. 2023FRAMM: Fair Ranking with Missing Modalities for Clinical Trial Site Selectioncited by 6
  5. 2022Probabilistic Permutation Graph Search: Black-Box Optimization for Fairness in Rankingcited by 4
  6. 2022FairMILE: Towards an Efficient Framework for Fair Graph Representation Learningcited by 4
  7. 2022Regulating Gatekeeper AI and Data: Transparency, Access, and Fairness under the DMA, the GDPR, and beyondcited by 4
  8. 2022Clinical trial site matching with improved diversity using fair policy learningcited by 3
  9. 2023The Role of Relevance in Fair Rankingcited by 3
  10. 2023Evaluative Item-Contrastive Explanations in Rankingscited by 3
  11. 2021Finding Representative Group Fairness Metrics Using Correlation Estimationscited by 2
  12. 2022Balancing Utility and Fairness in Submodular Maximization (Technical Report)cited by 2
  13. 2023Biases in Scholarly Recommender Systems: Impact, Prevalence, and Mitigationcited by 2
  14. 2022Modeling Human Behavior Part II -- Cognitive approaches and Uncertaintycited by 1
  15. 2022Towards Auditing Unsupervised Learning Algorithms and Human Processes For Fairnesscited by 1
  16. 2023Optimizing Group-Fair Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Ex-Post Fairnesscited by 1
  17. 2022Scaling up Ranking under Constraints for Live Recommendations by Replacing Optimization with Predictioncited by 0
  18. 2022Detection of Groups with Biased Representation in Rankingcited by 0
  19. 2023Learning to Re-rank with Constrained Meta-Optimal Transportcited by 0
  20. 2023Explainable Disparity Compensation for Efficient Fair Rankingcited by 0
  21. 2023Multi-Task Learning For Reduced Popularity Bias In Multi-Territory Video Recommendationscited by 0
  22. 2025A Tutorial On Intersectionality in Fair Rankingscited by 0
  23. 2025Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 0
  24. 2025Producer-Fairness in Sequential Bundle Recommendationcited by 0
  25. 2025Learning to Rank with Top-K Fairnesscited by 0
  26. 2025Controlling Gender Bias in Retrieval via a Backpack Architecturecited by 0
  27. 2026Generalizing Fair Top-k Selection: An Integrative Approachcited by 0
  28. 2026Scoring Is Not Enough: Addressing Gaps in Utility-fairness Trade-offs for Rankingcited by 0