Towards Auditing Unsupervised Learning Algorithms and Human Processes For Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing work on fairness typically focuses on making known machine learning algorithms fairer. Fair variants of classification, clustering, outlier detection and other styles of algorithms exist. However, an understudied area is the topic of auditing an algorithm's output to determine fairness. Existing work has explored the two group classification problem for binary protected status variables using standard definitions of statistical parity. Here we build upon the area of auditing by exploring the multi-group setting under more complex definitions of fairness.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.
Builds on
10 of 20 references.
References · 10
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
- 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
- 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
- 2019Guarantees for Spectral Clustering with Fairness Constraintscited by 72
- 2019Fair k-Center Clustering for Data Summarizationcited by 65
- 2017Designing Fair Ranking Schemescited by 40
- 2020Towards Fair Deep Anomaly Detectioncited by 24
- 2017Fuzzy Approach Topic Discovery in Health and Medical Corporacited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.