mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detection of Groups with Biased Representation in Ranking

arXiv 2301.00719 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2022cs.LG cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-life tools for decision-making in many critical domains are based on ranking results. With the increasing awareness of algorithmic fairness, recent works have presented measures for fairness in ranking. Many of those definitions consider the representation of different ``protected groups'', in the top-k ranked items, for any reasonable k. Given the protected groups, confirming algorithmic fairness is a simple task. However, the groups' definitions may be unknown in advance. In this paper, we study the problem of detecting groups with biased representation in the top-k ranked items, eliminating the need to pre-define protected groups. The number of such groups possible can be exponential, making the problem hard. We propose efficient search algorithms for two different fairness measures: global representation bounds, and proportional representation. Then we propose a method to explain the bias in the representations of groups utilizing the notion of Shapley values. We conclude with an experimental study, showing the scalability of our approach and demonstrating the usefulness of the proposed algorithms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2022.

Builds on

11 of 40 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  3. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  4. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  5. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  6. 2016Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputscited by 81
  7. 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
  8. 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
  9. 2017Designing Fair Ranking Schemescited by 40
  10. 2018Assessing and Remedying Coverage for a Given Datasetcited by 21
  11. 2021Identifying Biased Subgroups in Ranking and Classificationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.