mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Tutorial On Intersectionality in Fair Rankings

arXiv 2502.05333 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2025cs.CY cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address the critical issue of biased algorithms and unfair rankings, which have permeated various sectors, including search engines, recommendation systems, and workforce management. These biases can lead to discriminatory outcomes in a data-driven world, especially against marginalized and underrepresented groups. Efforts towards responsible data science and responsible artificial intelligence aim to mitigate these biases and promote fairness, diversity, and transparency. However, most fairness-aware ranking methods singularly focus on protected attributes such as race, gender, or socio-economic status, neglecting the intersectionality of these attributes, i.e., the interplay between multiple social identities. Understanding intersectionality is crucial to ensure that existing inequalities are not preserved by fair rankings. We offer a description of the main ways to incorporate intersectionality in fair ranking systems through practical examples and provide a comparative overview of existing literature and a synoptic table summarizing the various methodologies. Our analysis highlights the need for intersectionality to attain fairness, while also emphasizing that fairness, alone, does not necessarily imply intersectionality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2025.

Builds on

23 of 70 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  3. 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
  4. 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
  5. 2017Designing Fair Ranking Schemescited by 40
  6. 2023Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Surveycited by 30
  7. 2020Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 29
  8. 2020Interventions for Ranking in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 27
  9. 2020User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Marketscited by 23
  10. 2021When Fair Ranking Meets Uncertain Inferencecited by 22
  11. 2019Balanced Ranking with Diversity Constraintscited by 20
  12. 2022De-biasing "bias" measurementcited by 20
11 more
  1. 2021InfoFair: Information-Theoretic Intersectional Fairnesscited by 15
  2. 2020Causal Multi-Level Fairnesscited by 13
  3. 2020Causal intersectionality for fair rankingcited by 12
  4. 2021FairCanary: Rapid Continuous Explainable Fairnesscited by 12
  5. 2018A Nutritional Label for Rankingscited by 10
  6. 2017On Measuring Bias in Online Informationcited by 7
  7. 2018The Schulze Method of Votingcited by 7
  8. 2018On Obtaining Stable Rankingscited by 6
  9. 2019Teaching Responsible Data Science: Charting New Pedagogical Territorycited by 6
  10. 2023The Role of Relevance in Fair Rankingcited by 3
  11. 2022MANI-Rank: Multiple Attribute and Intersectional Group Fairness for Consensus Rankingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.