mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tuning without Peeking: Provable Generalization Bounds and Robust LLM Post-Training

arXiv 2507.01752 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Gradient-based optimization is the workhorse of deep learning, offering efficient and scalable training via backpropagation. However, exposing gradients during training can leak sensitive information about the underlying data, raising privacy and security concerns such as susceptibility to data poisoning attacks. In contrast, black-box optimization methods, which treat the model as an opaque function, relying solely on function evaluations to guide optimization, offer a promising alternative in scenarios where data access is restricted, adversarial risks are high, or overfitting is a concern. This paper introduces BBoxER, an evolutionary black-box method for LLM post-training that induces an information bottleneck via implicit compression of the training data. Leveraging the tractability of information flow, we provide non-vacuous generalization bounds and strong theoretical guarantees for robustness to data poisoning attacks and extraction attacks, while ensuring privacy by design. In experiments with LLMs, we demonstrate empirically that black-box optimization methods-despite the scalability and computational challenges inherent to black-box approaches-are able to learn, showing how a few iterations of BBoxER improve performance, generalize well on a benchmark of reasoning datasets, and are robust to membership inference attacks. This positions BBoxER as an attractive add-on on top of gradient-based optimization, offering suitability for deployment in restricted environments while also providing non-vacuous generalization guarantees.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 80 of its 144 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.

Builds on

80 of 144 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023RLHFPoison: Reward Poisoning Attack for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback in Large Language Models16 Nov
  2. 2023Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection31 Jul
  3. 2023On the Exploitability of Instruction Tuning28 Jun

Other references · 77

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  7. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  8. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  9. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  11. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  12. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
38 more
  1. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  3. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  4. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  5. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
  6. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  7. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 559
  8. 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 555
  9. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 533
  10. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 533
  11. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 450
  12. 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generationcited by 439
  13. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
  14. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 387
  15. 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 364
  16. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  17. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  18. 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
  19. 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 254
  20. 2022Selective Annotation Makes Language Models Better Few-Shot Learnerscited by 242
  21. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
  22. 2023Transformers as Algorithms: Generalization and Stability in In-context Learningcited by 220
  23. 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solverscited by 155
  24. 2023Poisoning Retrieval Corpora by Injecting Adversarial Passagescited by 153
  25. 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 152
  26. 2023Neural Architecture Search: Insights from 1000 Paperscited by 136
  27. 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 129
  28. 2018Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: A PAC-Bayesian Compression Approachcited by 125
  29. 2023Universal Jailbreak Backdoors from Poisoned Human Feedbackcited by 120
  30. 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
  31. 2024Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuningcited by 93
  32. 2025CPPO: Accelerating the Training of Group Relative Policy Optimization-Based Reasoning Modelscited by 93
  33. 2023Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibrationcited by 90
  34. 2023Effective Prompt Extraction from Language Modelscited by 83
  35. 2023Flocks of Stochastic Parrots: Differentially Private Prompt Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 80
  36. 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 75
  37. 2022Differentially Private Optimization on Large Model at Small Costcited by 65
  38. 2024Exploiting LLM Quantizationcited by 61

50 most cited of 77 All 77 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.