mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Private Prediction via PAC Privacy

arXiv 2601.14033 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models are increasingly served behind APIs. This renders private prediction, i.e., privatizing a model's outputs rather than its parameters, a natural privacy target: model outputs are lower-dimensional and far more stable to training-data changes than weights. While differential privacy (DP) cannot effectively exploit this as it calibrates noise to worst-case sensitivity that is intractable to bound for non-convex models, we argue that PAC privacy is a natural fit for private prediction. It is instance-based, and calibrates noise to a black-box function's empirical stability to control mutual-information (MI) leakage. The missing ingredient is efficient, adaptive composition. Serving predictions means answering a long stream of adaptively chosen queries from untrusted users; existing composition either fails under adaptivity, grows quadratically, or reverts to input-independent, DP-like noise. We close this gap with a new adversarial composition result via adaptive noise calibration and prove that MI accumulates only linearly under adaptive and adversarial querying. Experiments across modalities show that prediction stability enables high utility even at a tiny per-query budget: on CIFAR-10, we achieve 87.79% accuracy with a per-query MI budget of 2-32. This enables serving one million queries while provably bounding membership-inference success to 51.08% -- the same guarantee as (0.04, 10-5)-DP. Further, in the presence of auxiliary public data, the large volume of PAC-private predictions enables us to distill a publishable model that can be queried without limit. Concretely, 210,000 private labels on an ImageNet subset distill into a student reaching 91.86% accuracy on CIFAR-10 with membership inference success bounded by 50.49%, comparable to (0.02, 10-5)-DP.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2026.

Builds on

30 of 63 references.

References · 30

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  5. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  6. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  7. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  8. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  9. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  10. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  11. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  12. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
18 more
  1. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
  2. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 348
  3. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
  4. 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 269
  5. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
  6. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
  7. 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 148
  8. 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
  9. 2022Submix: Practical Private Prediction for Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 31
  10. 2023Model-as-a-Service (MaaS): A Surveycited by 25
  11. 2020The Trade-Offs of Private Predictioncited by 22
  12. 2022PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data Processingcited by 19
  13. 2023Differentially Private Image Classification by Learning Priors from Random Processescited by 19
  14. 2024OSLO: One-Shot Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 13
  15. 2023Recent Advances of Differential Privacy in Centralized Deep Learning: A Systematic Surveycited by 12
  16. 2024Why Does Differential Privacy with Large Epsilon Defend Against Practical Membership Inference Attacks?cited by 12
  17. 2026Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGDcited by 4
  18. 2025Residual-PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Control Beyond the Gaussian Barriercited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Federated Learning via Explainable Adaptive Differential Privacy
  2. 2026Protecting Sensitive Data in Image Synthesis via PAC-Private Adaptation for Diffusion Models
  3. 2024Calibrating Practical Privacy Risks for Differentially Private Machine Learning
  4. 2024Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights
  5. 2024Noise Variance Optimization in Differential Privacy: A Game-Theoretic Approach Through Per-Instance Differential Privacy ↗
  6. 2022Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in Private (Deep) Learning
  7. 2026Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing (Extended Version)
  8. 2023PAC Privacy Preserving Diffusion Models