mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAC-Private Autoregressive Generation: Calibrating Noise to Ensemble Disagreement

arXiv 2609.05676 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language models adapted on private text are often served through APIs, so privacy leakage occurs through generated outputs rather than exposed weights. Private prediction protects these releases. Methods such as PMixED incur privacy cost at each release and increasingly rely on the public model over long horizons. PAC privacy instead calibrates noise to output variability across possible secrets, adding less noise when predictions are stable. To our knowledge, PAC-private prediction has not previously been extended from classification to autoregressive generation. We construct m=128 overlapping worlds from the private corpus, with each record appearing in exactly m/2 worlds, and train one adapter per world over a frozen public model. The realized world is the secret. At each token, the public model defines a candidate set, the worlds vote, and their posterior-weighted disagreement determines the PAC noise; unanimity requires no calibration noise. We prove I(S;Y1:T) ≤ I(S;HT) ≤ bT. Our contributions are extending PAC privacy to autoregressive generation, handling adaptive self-generated contexts, and introducing coupled decoding that preserves privacy accounting while avoiding greedy degeneration. On WikiText-103 with GPT-2-small, we retain 74% of the fine-tuning gain at a per-token budget of 2-32, while membership-inference success is bounded by 51.08% after 106 tokens; posterior-entropy estimates of leakage are roughly 17% of the charged budget. Inference privacy is not content protection: even when membership advantage on a memorized canary is indistinguishable from zero, the canary is emitted at the same rate. Against PMixED under matched membership-inference bounds on the same data universe and test set, we retain 98% of non-private headroom from 102 to 106 tokens, versus at most 56%, with no crossover.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  5. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  6. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  7. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  8. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
  9. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
  10. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 348
  11. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
  12. 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 269
10 more
  1. 2014A* Samplingcited by 151
  2. 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 148
  3. 2023Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generationcited by 96
  4. 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
  5. 2020The Trade-Offs of Private Predictioncited by 22
  6. 2024Differentially Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Modelscited by 22
  7. 2022PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data Processingcited by 19
  8. 2024Adaptively Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Modelscited by 4
  9. 2025Residual-PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Control Beyond the Gaussian Barriercited by 3
  10. 2026PAC to the Future: Zero-Knowledge Proofs of PAC Private Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.