mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DP-Fusion: Token-Level Differentially Private Inference for Large Language Models

arXiv 2507.04531 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) do not preserve privacy at inference-time. The LLM's outputs can inadvertently reveal information about the model's context, which presents a privacy challenge when the LLM is augmented via tools or databases containing sensitive information. Existing privacy-preserving methods at inference-time have significant limitations since they (i) lack provable guarantees or (ii) have a poor utility/privacy trade-off. We propose DP-Fusion, a Differentially Private Inference (DPI) mechanism for LLMs that provably bounds the influence a set of tokens in the context can have on the LLM's output. DP-Fusion works as follows: (1) label a subset of sensitive tokens, (2) infer the LLM without any sensitive tokens to obtain a baseline, (3) infer the LLM with the sensitive tokens, and (4) blend distributions so that the final output remains within a bounded distance of the baseline distribution. While this per-token influence bound also mitigates jailbreak-style prompt injection, we focus on document privatization, where the goal is to paraphrase a document containing sensitive tokens, e.g., personally identifiable information, so that no attacker can reliably infer them from the paraphrased document while preserving high text quality. The privacy/utility trade-off is controlled by ε, where ε=0 hides sensitive tokens entirely, while higher values trade off privacy for improved text quality. We show that our method creates token-level provably privatized documents with substantially improved theoretical and empirical privacy, achieving 6× lower perplexity than related DPI methods.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 36 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2025.

Builds on

36 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Models1 Feb

Other references · 35

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  3. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  4. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  5. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  6. 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 375
  7. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  8. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 328
  9. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 208
  10. 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 167
  11. 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 136
  12. 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 94
23 more
  1. 2024How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden Statescited by 92
  2. 2023Effective Prompt Extraction from Language Modelscited by 83
  3. 2021Differential Privacy for Text Analytics via Natural Text Sanitizationcited by 74
  4. 2023Language Model Inversioncited by 66
  5. 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
  6. 2023Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Promptingcited by 63
  7. 2024Pandora: Jailbreak GPTs by Retrieval Augmented Generation Poisoningcited by 62
  8. 2022A Customized Text Sanitization Mechanism with Differential Privacycited by 51
  9. 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
  10. 2024Extracting Prompts by Inverting LLM Outputscited by 40
  11. 2024LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Modelscited by 38
  12. 2024Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models May Backfire!cited by 36
  13. 2022Differentially Private Decoding in Large Language Modelscited by 34
  14. 2022Submix: Practical Private Prediction for Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 31
  15. 2024Mind the Inconspicuous: Revealing the Hidden Weakness in Aligned LLMs' Refusal Boundariescited by 26
  16. 2024Large Language Models are Advanced Anonymizerscited by 22
  17. 2024PII-Compass: Guiding LLM training data extraction prompts towards the target PII via groundingcited by 22
  18. 2024Differentially Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Modelscited by 21
  19. 2024Virtual Context: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks with Special Token Injectioncited by 16
  20. 2024Probing the Safety Response Boundary of Large Language Models via Unsafe Decoding Path Generationcited by 10
  21. 2025PIG: Privacy Jailbreak Attack on LLMs via Gradient-based Iterative In-Context Optimizationcited by 10
  22. 2024Understanding the Effects of Human-written Paraphrases in LLM-generated Text Detectioncited by 6
  23. 2025Can Large Language Models Really Recognize Your Name?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.