Adaptive Token-Weighted Differential Privacy for LLMs: Not All Tokens Require Equal Protection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) frequently memorize sensitive or personal information, raising significant privacy concerns. Existing variants of differential privacy stochastic gradient descent (DPSGD) inject uniform noise into every gradient step, significantly extending training time and reducing model accuracy. We propose that concentrating noise primarily on gradients associated with sensitive tokens can substantially decrease DP training time, strengthen the protection of sensitive information, and simultaneously preserve the model's performance on non-sensitive data. We operationalize this insight through Adaptive Token-Weighted Differential Privacy (ATDP), a modification of vanilla DP-SGD that adaptively assigns different gradient weights to sensitive and non-sensitive tokens. By employing a larger noise scale at the early stage of training, ATDP rapidly disrupts memorization of sensitive content. As a result, ATDP only requires a few additional epochs of lightweight post-processing following standard fine-tuning, injecting targeted noise primarily on parameters corresponding to sensitive tokens, thus minimally affecting the model's general capabilities. ATDP can be seamlessly integrated into any existing DP-based fine-tuning pipeline or directly applied to non-private models as a fast privacy-enhancing measure. Additionally, combined with an initial redacted fine-tuning phase, ATDP forms a streamlined DP pipeline that achieves comparable canary protection to state-of-the-art DP-SGD methods, significantly reduces the computational overhead of DP fine-tuning, shortening training time by approximately 90 percent, while achieving comparable or superior privacy protection and minimal accuracy degradation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2025.
Builds on
19 of 25 references.
References · 19
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 713
- 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
7 more
- 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 348
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 195
- 2021Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacycited by 117
- 2021Action-Based Conversations Dataset: A Corpus for Building More In-Depth Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 75
- 2021Selective Differential Privacy for Language Modelingcited by 62
- 2022Just Fine-tune Twice: Selective Differential Privacy for Large Language Modelscited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.