mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse Dueling Bandits

arXiv 1502.00133 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2015stat.ML cs.LGcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The dueling bandit problem is a variation of the classical multi-armed bandit in which the allowable actions are noisy comparisons between pairs of arms. This paper focuses on a new approach for finding the "best" arm according to the Borda criterion using noisy comparisons. We prove that in the absence of structural assumptions, the sample complexity of this problem is proportional to the sum of the inverse squared gaps between the Borda scores of each suboptimal arm and the best arm. We explore this dependence further and consider structural constraints on the pairwise comparison matrix (a particular form of sparsity natural to this problem) that can significantly reduce the sample complexity. This motivates a new algorithm called Successive Elimination with Comparison Sparsity (SECS) that exploits sparsity to find the Borda winner using fewer samples than standard algorithms. We also evaluate the new algorithm experimentally with synthetic and real data. The results show that the sparsity model and the new algorithm can provide significant improvements over standard approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 8; 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

29 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Efficient and Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits under Realizabilitycited by 44
  2. 2024Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queriescited by 39
  3. 2024Feel-Good Thompson Sampling for Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 23
  4. 2023Variance-Aware Regret Bounds for Stochastic Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 22
  5. 2023Borda Regret Minimization for Generalized Linear Dueling Banditscited by 17
  6. 2022Batched Dueling Banditscited by 10
  7. 2021Preference learning along multiple criteria: A game-theoretic perspectivecited by 9
  8. 2024Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits from Adversarial Feedbackcited by 9
  9. 2023Active Ranking of Experts Based on their Performances in Many Taskscited by 6
  10. 2022Versatile Dueling Bandits: Best-of-both-World Analyses for Online Learning from Preferencescited by 5
  11. 2022Dueling Convex Optimization with General Preferencescited by 5
  12. 2023When Can We Track Significant Preference Shifts in Dueling Bandits?cited by 5
17 more
  1. 2024Biased Dueling Bandits with Stochastic Delayed Feedbackcited by 3
  2. 2022An Asymptotically Optimal Batched Algorithm for the Dueling Bandit Problemcited by 2
  3. 2024Non-Stationary Dueling Bandits Under a Weighted Borda Criterioncited by 2
  4. 2024Multi-Player Approaches for Dueling Banditscited by 2
  5. 2025Clustering Items through Bandit Feedback: Finding the Right Feature out of Manycited by 2
  6. 2025Reinforcement Learning from Adversarial Preferences in Tabular MDPscited by 2
  7. 2025Preference-based Reinforcement Learning beyond Pairwise Comparisons: Benefits of Multiple Optionscited by 2
  8. 2026What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?cited by 2
  9. 2024Adversarial Multi-dueling Banditscited by 1
  10. 2024QuACK: A Multipurpose Queuing Algorithm for Cooperative k-Armed Banditscited by 1
  11. 2021Ordinal Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 0
  12. 2021Statistical Consequences of Dueling Banditscited by 0
  13. 2026PARWiS: Winner determination under shoestring budgets using active pairwise comparisonscited by 0
  14. 2026Best-of-Both-Worlds Multi-Dueling Bandits: Unified Algorithms for Stochastic and Adversarial Preferences under Condorcet and Borda Objectivescited by 0
  15. 2026A Finite Time Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimization with Preferential Feedbackcited by 0
  16. 2026Multi-User Dueling Bandits: A Fair Approach using Nash Social Welfarecited by 0
  17. 2026CUPID in the Model Zoo: Online Matchmaking for Selecting Your Dream LLMcited by 0