mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reinforcement Learning from Adversarial Preferences in Tabular MDPs

arXiv 2507.11706 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a new framework of episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with adversarial preferences, which we refer to as preference-based MDPs (PbMDPs). Unlike standard episodic MDPs with adversarial losses, where the numerical value of the loss is directly observed, in PbMDPs the learner instead observes preferences between two candidate arms, which represent the choices being compared. In this work, we focus specifically on the setting where the reward functions are determined by Borda scores. We begin by establishing a regret lower bound for PbMDPs with Borda scores. As a preliminary step, we present a simple instance to prove a lower bound of Omega(√HSAT) for episodic MDPs with adversarial losses, where H is the number of steps per episode, S is the number of states, A is the number of actions, and T is the number of episodes. Leveraging this construction, we then derive a regret lower bound of Omega( (H2 S K)1/3 T2/3 ) for PbMDPs with Borda scores, where K is the number of arms. Next, we develop algorithms that achieve a regret bound of order T2/3. We first propose a global optimization approach based on online linear optimization over the set of all occupancy measures, achieving a regret bound of tildeO((H2 S2 K)1/3 T2/3 ) under known transitions. However, this approach suffers from suboptimal dependence on the potentially large number of states S and computational inefficiency. To address this, we propose a policy optimization algorithm whose regret is roughly bounded by tildeO( (H6 S K5)1/3 T2/3 ) under known transitions, and further extend the result to the unknown-transition setting.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 32 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2025.

Builds on

32 of 52 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  2. 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
  3. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
  4. 2019Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy Optimizationcited by 205
  5. 2019On the Theory of Policy Gradient Methods: Optimality, Approximation, and Distribution Shiftcited by 177
  6. 2019Provably efficient RL with Rich Observations via Latent State Decodingcited by 169
  7. 2020Episodic Reinforcement Learning in Finite MDPs: Minimax Lower Bounds Revisitedcited by 106
  8. 2021Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferencescited by 106
  9. 2019Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPscited by 105
  10. 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 102
  11. 2015Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 101
  12. 2019Learning Adversarial MDPs with Bandit Feedback and Unknown Transitioncited by 85
20 more
  1. 2015Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Banditscited by 80
  2. 2020Optimistic Policy Optimization with Bandit Feedbackcited by 79
  3. 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Functioncited by 68
  4. 2020Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guaranteescited by 65
  5. 2014Reducing Dueling Bandits to Cardinal Banditscited by 62
  6. 2019Dueling Posterior Sampling for Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
  7. 2015Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Dueling Bandit Problemcited by 52
  8. 2021Policy Optimization in Adversarial MDPs: Improved Exploration via Dilated Bonusescited by 52
  9. 2020Simultaneously Learning Stochastic and Adversarial Episodic MDPs with Known Transitioncited by 48
  10. 2023Making RL with Preference-based Feedback Efficient via Randomizationcited by 46
  11. 2021The best of both worlds: stochastic and adversarial episodic MDPs with unknown transitioncited by 40
  12. 2020Adversarial Dueling Banditscited by 33
  13. 2016A Relative Exponential Weighing Algorithm for Adversarial Utility-based Dueling Banditscited by 31
  14. 2020Online learning in MDPs with linear function approximation and bandit feedbackcited by 30
  15. 2015Sparse Dueling Banditscited by 29
  16. 2018Approximate Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 21
  17. 2023Best of Both Worlds Policy Optimizationcited by 17
  18. 2023Borda Regret Minimization for Generalized Linear Dueling Banditscited by 17
  19. 2024A Simple and Adaptive Learning Rate for FTRL in Online Learning with Minimax Regret of Theta(T2/3) and its Application to Best-of-Both-Worldscited by 3
  20. 2024Non-Stationary Dueling Bandits Under a Weighted Borda Criterioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Kernel-Based MDPs from Episodic Preferential Feedback
  2. 2026Toward Optimal Regret in Adversarial MDPs with Stochastic Hard Constraints
  3. 2026Tighter Regret Bounds for Contextual Action-Set Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Continuous-Time Episodic MDPs with Poisson Decision Epochs
  5. 2026Learning Markov Decision Processes under Fully Bandit Feedback
  6. 2026Rate-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial Linear CMDPs
  7. 2024Horizon-Free Regret for Linear Markov Decision Processes
  8. 2024Scale-free Adversarial Reinforcement Learning