mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Statistical Consequences of Dueling Bandits

arXiv 2111.00870 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2021cs.LG math.ST stat.THcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-Armed-Bandit frameworks have often been used by researchers to assess educational interventions, however, recent work has shown that it is more beneficial for a student to provide qualitative feedback through preference elicitation between different alternatives, making a dueling bandits framework more appropriate. In this paper, we explore the statistical quality of data under this framework by comparing traditional uniform sampling to a dueling bandit algorithm and find that dueling bandit algorithms perform well at cumulative regret minimisation, but lead to inflated Type-I error rates and reduced power under certain circumstances. Through these results we provide insight into the challenges and opportunities in using dueling bandit algorithms to run adaptive experiments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2021.

Builds on

10 of 28 references.

References · 10

  1. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 121
  2. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 114
  3. 2014Algorithms for multi-armed bandit problemscited by 64
  4. 2016Double Thompson Sampling for Dueling Banditscited by 42
  5. 2017Accurate Inference for Adaptive Linear Modelscited by 39
  6. 2015Copeland Dueling Banditscited by 36
  7. 2020Power Constrained Banditscited by 30
  8. 2015Sparse Dueling Banditscited by 29
  9. 2017Policy Learning with Observational Datacited by 19
  10. 2013Adaptive Crowdsourcing Algorithms for the Bandit Survey Problemcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.