Non-Stationary Dueling Bandits Under a Weighted Borda Criterion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In K-armed dueling bandits, the learner receives preference feedback between arms, and the regret of an arm is defined in terms of its suboptimality to a textitwinner arm. The textitnon-stationary variant of the problem, motivated by concerns of changing user preferences, has received recent interest (Saha and Gupta, 2022; Buening and Saha, 2023; Suk and Agarwal, 2023). The goal here is to design algorithms with low em dynamic regret, ideally without foreknowledge of the amount of change. The notion of regret here is tied to a notion of winner arm, most typically taken to be a so-called Condorcet winner or a Borda winner. However, the aforementioned results mostly focus on the Condorcet winner. In comparison, the Borda version of this problem has received less attention which is the focus of this work. We establish the first optimal and adaptive dynamic regret upper bound tildeO(tildeL1/3 K1/3 T2/3 ), where tildeL is the unknown number of significant Borda winner switches. We also introduce a novel textitweighted Borda score framework which generalizes both the Borda and Condorcet problems. This framework surprisingly allows a Borda-style regret analysis of the Condorcet problem and establishes improved bounds over the theoretical state-of-art in regimes with a large number of arms or many spurious changes in Condorcet winner. Such a generalization was not known and could be of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.
Builds on
25 of 57 references.
References · 25
- 2015Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 101
- 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 100
- 2019A New Algorithm for Non-stationary Contextual Bandits: Efficient, Optimal, and Parameter-freecited by 71
- 2014Reducing Dueling Bandits to Cardinal Banditscited by 62
- 2015Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Dueling Bandit Problemcited by 51
- 2016Double Thompson Sampling for Dueling Banditscited by 42
- 2014Optimal Exploration-Exploitation in a Multi-Armed-Bandit Problem with Non-stationary Rewardscited by 41
- 2015Copeland Dueling Banditscited by 36
- 2020Adversarial Dueling Banditscited by 33
- 2016A Relative Exponential Weighing Algorithm for Adversarial Utility-based Dueling Banditscited by 31
- 2015Sparse Dueling Banditscited by 29
- 2022A New Look at Dynamic Regret for Non-Stationary Stochastic Banditscited by 28
13 more
- 2021Tracking Most Significant Arm Switches in Banditscited by 27
- 2018Approximate Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 21
- 2023Borda Regret Minimization for Generalized Linear Dueling Banditscited by 17
- 2016Copeland Dueling Bandit Problem: Regret Lower Bound, Optimal Algorithm, and Computationally Efficient Algorithmcited by 16
- 2023Smooth Non-Stationary Banditscited by 13
- 2021Optimal and Efficient Dynamic Regret Algorithms for Non-Stationary Dueling Banditscited by 9
- 2022ANACONDA: An Improved Dynamic Regret Algorithm for Adaptive Non-Stationary Dueling Banditscited by 8
- 2018Factored Banditscited by 7
- 2021On Slowly-varying Non-stationary Banditscited by 7
- 2022Non-Stationary Dueling Banditscited by 7
- 2022Finding Optimal Arms in Non-stochastic Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-bandit Feedback and Finite Budgetcited by 5
- 2023When Can We Track Significant Preference Shifts in Dueling Bandits?cited by 5
- 2018Duelling Bandits with Weak Regret in Adversarial Environmentscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025Non-Stationary Lipschitz Banditscited by 3
- 2025Reinforcement Learning from Adversarial Preferences in Tabular MDPscited by 2
- 2025Reinforcement Learning from Adversarial Preferences in Tabular MDPs15 Jul 2025
- 2025Non-Stationary Lipschitz Bandits24 May 2025