mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PARWiS: Winner determination under shoestring budgets using active pairwise comparisons

arXiv 2603.01171 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.CC cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Determining a winner among a set of items using active pairwise comparisons under a limited budget is a challenging problem in preference-based learning. The goal of this study is to implement and evaluate the PARWiS algorithm, which shows spectral ranking and disruptive pair selection to identify the best item under shoestring budgets. This work have extended the PARWiS with a contextual variant (Contextual PARWiS) and a reinforcement learning-based variant (RL PARWiS), comparing them against baselines, including Double Thompson Sampling and a random selection strategy. This evaluation spans synthetic and real-world datasets (Jester and MovieLens), using budgets of 40, 60, and 80 comparisons for 20 items. The performance is measured through recovery fraction, true rank of reported winner, reported rank of true winner, and cumulative regret, alongside the separation metric (Delta1,2). Results show that PARWiS and RL PARWiS outperform baselines across all datasets, particularly in the Jester dataset with a higher (Delta1,2), while performance gaps narrow in the more challenging MovieLens dataset with a smaller (Delta1,2). Contextual PARWiS shows comparable performance to PARWiS, indicating that contextual features may require further tuning to provide significant benefits.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 22 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 101
  2. 2016Double Thompson Sampling for Dueling Banditscited by 42
  3. 2015Spectral MLE: Top-K Rank Aggregation from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 34
  4. 2015Sparse Dueling Banditscited by 29
  5. 2024Linear Contextual Bandits with Interferencecited by 8
  6. 2022Fast online inference for nonlinear contextual bandit based on Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 7
  7. 2019Scalable Bayesian Preference Learning for Crowdscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PairJudge RM: Perform Best-of-N Sampling with Knockout Tournament
  2. 2025ResponseRank: Data-Efficient Reward Modeling through Preference Strength Learning
  3. 2026Reward Learning from Best-of-N Preference Data: Targets, Tradeoffs, and Design Principles
  4. 2024On the Exponential Convergence for Offline RLHF with Pairwise Comparisons
  5. 2025When Less Is More: Binary Feedback Can Outperform Ordinal Comparisons in Ranking Recovery
  6. 2026Evaluating Reward Model Generalization via Pairwise Maximum Discrepancy Competitions
  7. 2026Calibrated Preference Learning: The Case of Label Ranking
  8. 2025DCRM: A Heuristic to Measure Response Pair Quality in Preference Optimization