Minimax Optimality of Shampoo for Nonstationary Stochastic Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop a comprehensive theoretical analysis of Matrix Shampoo for tracking time-varying optima in nonstationary stochastic optimization. We derive finite-horizon high-probability bounds for average tracking error that disentangle initialization, optimizer drift, momentum-induced drift penalty, stochastic noise, and adaptive preconditioning, with explicit dependence on momentum parameter (β1) and stabilization parameter (varepsilon). These bounds reveal an explicit drift--noise and stability--geometry tradeoffs: noise-dominated regimes favor larger β1, which provides stronger first-moment averaging and greater suppression of gradient noise, whereas drift-dominated regimes favor smaller β1, allowing faster adaptation to moving optimizer. Larger varepsilon reduces the preconditioner-perturbation term while weakening Shampoo's ability to exploit matrix geometry, thereby reducing adaptivity. We establish a matching minimax lower bound under squared path-variation constraint, proving the information-theoretic optimality of Shampoo over the class of causal optimization procedures. Under a constant stepsize, we establish high-probability bounds for the average projected stationarity gap along general nonstationary nonconvex objectives. We validate our theoretical findings on both synthetic and multiple real-world problems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.
Builds on
43 of 60 references.
References · 43
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 841
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 426
- 2017CORe50: a New Dataset and Benchmark for Continuous Object Recognitioncited by 289
- 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 175
- 2023Understanding plasticity in neural networkscited by 174
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 171
31 more
- 2023Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptionscited by 99
- 2018Tight Analyses for Non-Smooth Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 97
- 2022The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagerycited by 93
- 2023A Distributed Data-Parallel PyTorch Implementation of the Distributed Shampoo Optimizer for Training Neural Networks At-Scalecited by 77
- 2025Benchmarking Optimizers for Large Language Model Pretrainingcited by 68
- 2016Tracking Slowly Moving Clairvoyant: Optimal Dynamic Regret of Online Learning with True and Noisy Gradientcited by 66
- 2024MARS: Unleashing the Power of Variance Reduction for Training Large Modelscited by 64
- 2024A New Perspective on Shampoo's Preconditionercited by 59
- 2024Slow and Steady Wins the Race: Maintaining Plasticity with Hare and Tortoise Networkscited by 43
- 2020Disentangling Adaptive Gradient Methods from Learning Ratescited by 42
- 2025Structured Preconditioners in Adaptive Optimization: A Unified Analysiscited by 33
- 2021Adaptivity without Compromise: A Momentumized, Adaptive, Dual Averaged Gradient Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 28
- 2025Purifying Shampoo: Investigating Shampoo's Heuristics by Decomposing its Preconditionercited by 23
- 20244-bit Shampoo for Memory-Efficient Network Trainingcited by 18
- 2025A Stable Whitening Optimizer for Efficient Neural Network Trainingcited by 18
- 2023Sketchy: Memory-efficient Adaptive Regularization with Frequent Directionscited by 17
- 2021Stochastic Optimization under Distributional Driftcited by 15
- 2019Domain-independent Dominance of Adaptive Methodscited by 13
- 2025Adaptive Preconditioners Trigger Loss Spikes in Adamcited by 13
- 2024Understanding Adam Requires Better Rotation Dependent Assumptionscited by 11
- 2022Dynamic Regret of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Strongly Convex Problemscited by 4
- 2026Dynamic Regret via Discounted-to-Dynamic Reduction with Applications to Curved Losses and Adam Optimizercited by 4
- 2023KrADagrad: Kronecker Approximation-Domination Gradient Preconditioned Stochastic Optimizationcited by 3
- 2026On the Provable Suboptimality of Momentum SGD in Nonstationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026DASH: Faster Shampoo via Batched Block Preconditioning and Efficient Inverse-Root Solverscited by 2
- 2026FOAM: Frequency and Operator Error-Based Adaptive Damping Method for Reducing Staleness-Oriented Error for Shampoocited by 2
- 2026The Convergence Behavior of Adam under Heavy-Tailed Noisecited by 2
- 2026Convergence Rate Analysis of the AdamW-style Shampoo: Unifying One-Sided and Two-Sided Preconditioningcited by 1
- 2026Adapt or Forget: Provable Tradeoffs Between Adam and SGD in Nonstationary Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Revisiting Adam for Streaming Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Analysis of Adam Algorithms for Stochastic Dynamic Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.