Dynamic Regret via Discounted-to-Dynamic Reduction with Applications to Curved Losses and Adam Optimizer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study dynamic regret minimization in non-stationary online learning, with a primary focus on follow-the-regularized-leader (FTRL) methods. FTRL is important for curved losses and for understanding adaptive optimizers such as Adam, yet existing dynamic regret analyses are less explored for FTRL. To address this, we build on the discounted-to-dynamic reduction and present a modular way to obtain dynamic regret bounds of FTRL-related problems. Specifically, we focus on two representative curved losses: linear regression and logistic regression. Our method not only simplifies existing proofs for the optimal dynamic regret of online linear regression, but also yields new dynamic regret guarantees for online logistic regression. Beyond online convex optimization, we apply the reduction to analyze the Adam optimizers, obtaining optimal convergence rates in stochastic, non-convex, and non-smooth settings. The reduction also enables a more detailed treatment of Adam with two discount parameters (β1,β2), leading to new results for both clipped and clip-free variants of Adam optimizers.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.
Builds on
65 of 95 references.
References · 65
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 303
- 2019Momentum-Based Variance Reduction in Non-Convex SGDcited by 302
- 2019Adaptive Gradient Methods with Dynamic Bound of Learning Ratecited by 181
- 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 169
- 2018Adaptive Online Learning in Dynamic Environmentscited by 130
- 2018A Sufficient Condition for Convergences of Adam and RMSPropcited by 124
- 2022Adam Can Converge Without Any Modification On Update Rulescited by 112
- 2015Strongly Adaptive Online Learningcited by 102
38 more
- 2023Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptionscited by 97
- 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 91
- 2016Scale-Free Online Learningcited by 83
- 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
- 2021Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 66
- 2013Relative Loss Bounds for On-line Density Estimation with the Exponential Family of Distributionscited by 59
- 2021Impossible Tuning Made Possible: A New Expert Algorithm and Its Applicationscited by 52
- 2021A Novel Convergence Analysis for Algorithms of the Adam Familycited by 50
- 2022Parameter-free Mirror Descentcited by 45
- 2013Dynamical Models and Tracking Regret in Online Convex Programmingcited by 42
- 2023Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex Conversioncited by 42
- 2019Bandit Convex Optimization in Non-stationary Environmentscited by 41
- 2018Logistic Regression: The Importance of Being Impropercited by 40
- 2025In Search of Adam's Secret Saucecited by 40
- 2021Optimal Dynamic Regret in Exp-Concave Online Learningcited by 39
- 2023Closing the Gap Between the Upper Bound and the Lower Bound of Adam's Iteration Complexitycited by 38
- 2021A gradient sampling method with complexity guarantees for Lipschitz functions in high and low dimensionscited by 37
- 2022No-Regret Learning in Time-Varying Zero-Sum Gamescited by 36
- 2020A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithmscited by 35
- 2020Improved Analysis for Dynamic Regret of Strongly Convex and Smooth Functionscited by 33
- 2014Logistic Regression: Tight Bounds for Stochastic and Online Optimizationcited by 30
- 2021On the Finite-Time Complexity and Practical Computation of Approximate Stationarity Concepts of Lipschitz Functionscited by 30
- 2022Optimal Dynamic Regret in Proper Online Learning with Strongly Convex Losses and Beyondcited by 27
- 2022Adapting to Online Label Shift with Provable Guaranteescited by 26
- 2023Deterministic Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 25
- 2018AdaShift: Decorrelation and Convergence of Adaptive Learning Rate Methodscited by 24
- 2024Understanding Adam Optimizer via Online Learning of Updates: Adam is FTRL in Disguisecited by 23
- 2023Adam-family Methods for Nonsmooth Optimization with Convergence Guaranteescited by 22
- 2024Adam with model exponential moving average is effective for nonconvex optimizationcited by 22
- 2024Random Scaling and Momentum for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimizationcited by 18
- 2020Efficient improper learning for online logistic regressioncited by 16
- 2022Pushing the Efficiency-Regret Pareto Frontier for Online Learning of Portfolios and Quantum Statescited by 15
- 2023Efficient Methods for Non-stationary Online Learningcited by 15
- 2022Scale-free Unconstrained Online Learning for Curved Lossescited by 13
- 2022Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selectioncited by 13
- 2017Online Learning for Changing Environments using Coin Bettingcited by 12
- 2019Trading-Off Static and Dynamic Regret in Online Least-Squares and Beyondcited by 12
- 2024Discounted Adaptive Online Learning: Towards Better Regularizationcited by 12
50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Online Learning with Gradient-Variation Interval Regretcited by 1
- 2026Adam Converges in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Adam Converges in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization21 Jun 2026
- 2026Online Learning with Gradient-Variation Interval Regret2 Jun 2026