Dynamic Regret of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Strongly Convex Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adaptive gradient algorithms such as ADAGRAD and its variants have gained popularity in the training of deep neural networks. While many works as for adaptive methods have focused on the static regret as a performance metric to achieve a good regret guarantee, the dynamic regret analyses of these methods remain unclear. As opposed to the static regret, dynamic regret is considered to be a stronger concept of performance measurement in the sense that it explicitly elucidates the non-stationarity of the environment. In this paper, we go through a variant of ADAGRAD (referred to as M-ADAGRAD ) in a strong convex setting via the notion of dynamic regret, which measures the performance of an online learner against a reference (optimal) solution that may change over time. We demonstrate a regret bound in terms of the path-length of the minimizer sequence that essentially reflects the non-stationarity of environments. In addition, we enhance the dynamic regret bound by exploiting the multiple accesses of the gradient to the learner in each round. Empirical results indicate that M-ADAGRAD works also well in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2022.
Builds on
14 of 27 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 173
- 2016Tracking Slowly Moving Clairvoyant: Optimal Dynamic Regret of Online Learning with True and Noisy Gradientcited by 65
- 2017Variants of RMSProp and Adagrad with Logarithmic Regret Boundscited by 50
- 2016MetaGrad: Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learningcited by 46
- 2016Improved Dynamic Regret for Non-degenerate Functionscited by 46
- 2013Dynamical Models and Tracking Regret in Online Convex Programmingcited by 42
- 2020A new regret analysis for Adam-type algorithmscited by 35
- 2019DADAM: A Consensus-based Distributed Adaptive Gradient Method for Online Optimizationcited by 30
- 2014Online Distributed Optimization on Dynamic Networkscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Universal Dynamic Regret and Constraint Violation Bounds for Constrained Online Convex Optimizationcited by 3
- 2023Online (Non-)Convex Learning via Tempered Optimismcited by 0
- 2026Structure-Dependent Regret and Constraint Violation Bounds for Online Convex Optimization with Time-Varying Constraintscited by 0
- 2026Structure-Dependent Regret and Constraint Violation Bounds for Online Convex Optimization with Time-Varying Constraints15 Mar 2026
- 2025Universal Dynamic Regret and Constraint Violation Bounds for Constrained Online Convex Optimization2 Oct 2025
- 2023Online (Non-)Convex Learning via Tempered Optimism18 Jan 2023